The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities
Abstract
A 1980 study using the Delphi technique identified field instruction issues and research priorities. In this article, the author reports the findings of a study undertaken to determine if the issues and priorities have changed in the past decade. Twelve national experts reached a consensus on 29 of 61 statements/issues and on three research priorities for the next decade. As in 1980, the study participants viewed the Delphi technique as having strength in gaining consensus, allowing dialogue between geographically separated experts, and serving as an effective means of learning for participants. The prioritized research agenda developed by the experts in 1991 includes the need for empirical analysis of outcomes related to field education; models to ensure quality of field instruction; and processes to help field instructors assist students, especially in integrating classroom and field instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Consensus measurement in Delphi studies
von der Gracht, H. A. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 · Cited by 1,831
Personas and user-centered design: how can personas benefit product design processes?
Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2011) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003 · Cited by 559
Gnatzy, T., Warth, J., von der Gracht, H., & Darkow, I.-L. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.006 · Cited by 302
Defining the goals of Product Passports by circular product strategies
Reich, R. H., Ayan, J., Alaerts, L., & Van Acker, K. (2023) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.044 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Raskin, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Work Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-89
- ISSN
- 1043-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5811
- OpenAlex
- W1489409926
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215
- The paper
- Raskin, M. S. (1994). The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities. Journal of Social Work Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
