Cited by 559Persona Design and ApplicationsDesign Education and PracticeUsability and User Interface Design

Personas and user-centered design: how can personas benefit product design processes?

Miaskiewicz, Tomasz, Kozar, Kenneth A.·2011·Design Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A.
Affiliations
  • NOVA School of Business and Economics (PT)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Miaskiewicz, Tomasz
Venue
Design Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
417-430
ISSN
0142-694X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143229876
Cited by
559
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Design Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Persona Design and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
personas, user-centered design, product design, customer needs, design process, expert opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review