The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D*
Abstract
This paper attempts to quantify the aggregate net effect of government funding on business R&D in 17 OECD Member countries over the past two decades. Grants, procurement, tax incentives and direct performance of research (in public laboratories or universities) are the major policy tools in the field. The major results of the study are the following: Direct government funding of R&D performed by firms has a positive effect on business financed R&D (except if the funding is targeted towards defence activities). Tax incentives have an immediate and positive effect on business-financed R&D; Direct funding as well as tax incentives are more effective when they are stable over time: firms do not invest in additional R&D if they are uncertain of the durability of the government support; Direct government funding and R&D tax incentives are substitutes: increased intensity of one reduces the effect of the other on business R&D; The stimulating effect of government funding varies with respect to its generosity: it increases up to a certain threshold (about 10% of business R&D) and then decreases beyond; Defence research performed in public laboratories and universities crowds out private R&D; Civilian public research is neutral for business R&D. * We thank the participants to various seminars, including the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technology Policy and the NBER 2000 Summer Institute on Productivity for helpful comments and suggestions. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect necessarily the views of the OECD or Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.2.i · Cited by 13,709
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing
Arrow, K. J. (1962) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295952 · Cited by 7,202
Toward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence
David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00087-6 · Cited by 1,634
R&D, Patents, and Productivity
Feller, I., & Griliches, Z. (1987) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3105518 · Cited by 1,225
Wallsten, S. J. (2000) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2601030 · Cited by 1,068
How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence
Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00085-2 · Cited by 1,012
Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth
Adams, J. D. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261702 · Cited by 704
Cited by
Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019 · Cited by 448
Mangul, S., Mosqueiro, T., Abdill, R. J., Duong, D., Mitchell, K., Sarwal, V., Hill, B., Brito, J., Littman, R. J., Statz, B., et al. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000333 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B.
- Venue
- Economics of Innovation and New Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-243
- ISSN
- 1043-8599 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8364
- OpenAlex
- W4292366152
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10438590290004555
- The paper
- Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D*. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290004555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.