Cited by 7,202Economic Growth and ProductivityEconomic Theory and InstitutionsGlobal trade and economics

The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing

Arrow, Kenneth J.·1962·The Review of Economic Studies

Abstract

Kenneth J. Arrow; The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 29, Issue 3, 1 June 1962, Pages 155–173, https://doi.or

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2295952

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As employees accumulate experience with a task, their performance tends to increase (learning-by-doing).

    “As employees accumulate experience with a task, their performance tends to increase-so-called learning-by-doing (Arrow 1962).”

    From AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning? (2024) · cites this paper as Arrow 1962

  • Learning in production entails much more than the standard 'learning by doing' of individual workers.

    “These interdependent changes, constituting what we call here 'learning in production', entail much more than the standard 'learning by doing' of individual workers (Arrow, 1962).”

    From Industrial Policy in the 21st Century (2020) · cites this paper as Arrow, 1962

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arrow, K. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Arrow, Kenneth J.
Venue
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
1962-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
155
ISSN
0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122992687
Cited by
7,202
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 269 · 2025: 361 · 2024: 323 · 2023: 328 · 2022: 316 · 2021: 330 · 2020: 301 · 2019: 361 · 2018: 294 · 2017: 297 · 2016: 256 · 2015: 260 · 2014: 248 · 2013: 273 · 2012: 254
FWCI
29.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
hands-on learning, economic implications, technological change, capital accumulation, human capital, economic growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review