The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Technology As A Factor Of Production: The Role Of Differences Among Firms
Open accessAbstract
Despite evidence that information technology (IT) has recently become a productive investment for a large cross-section of firms, a number of questions remain. Some of these issues can be addressed by extending the basic production function approach that was applied in earlier work. Specifically, in this short paper we: 1) control for individual firm differences in productivity by employing a ‘firm effects’ specification, 2) consider the more flexible translog specification instead of only the Cobb-Douglas specification, and 3) allow all parameters to vary between various subsectors of the economy. We find that while ‘firm effects’ may account for as much as half of the productivity benefits imputed to IT in earlier studies, the elasticity of IT remains positive and statistically significant. We also find that the estimates of IT elasticity and marginal product are little-changed when the less restrictive translog production function is employed. Finally, we find only limited evidence of differences in IT's marginal product between manufacturing and services and between the ‘measurable’ and ‘unmeasurable’ sectors of the economy. Surprisingly, we find that the marginal product of IT is at least as high in firms that did not grow during 1988–1992 sample period as it is in firms that grew.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Self-citation
Cited by
Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.23 · Cited by 3,335
Self-citationInvestment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716 · Cited by 877
Self-citationSchryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology
Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, L. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460 · Cited by 365
Self-citationEnterprise systems and ongoing process change
Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Cantrell, S. (2004) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150410518301 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L.
- Venue
- Economics of Innovation and New Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 183-200
- ISSN
- 1043-8599 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8364
- OpenAlex
- W2132993593
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Technology As A Factor Of Production: The Role Of Differences Among Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10438599500000002
- The paper
- Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1995). Information Technology As A Factor Of Production: The Role Of Differences Among Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599500000002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.