Cited by 877ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactCorporate Governance and ManagementInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures

Hitt, Lorin M., Wu, D.J., Zhou, Xiaoge·2002·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)software systems integrate key business and management processes within and beyond a firm's boundary.Although the business value of ERP implementations has been extensively debated in trade periodicals in the form of qualitative discussion or detailed case studies, there is little large-sample statistical evidence on whether the benefits of ERP implementation exceed the costs and risks. With multiyear multi-firm ERP implementation and financial data, we find that firms that invest in ERP tend to show higher performance across a wide variety of financial metrics. Even though there is a slowdown in business performance and productivity shortly after the implementation, financial markets consistently reward the adopters with higher market valuation (as measured by Tobin's q). Due to the lack of mid- and long-term post-implementation data, future research on the long-run impact of ERP is proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical evidence confirms that SMEs' dream to improve market positioning and to take advantage of governments' support programs have lately precipitated SMEs to adopt ERP in some economies.

    “empirical evidence confirms that their dream to improve market positioning and to take advantage of governments' support programs have lately precipitated SMEs to adopt ERP in some economies (Hitt et al., 2002;Lall & Teyarachakul, 2006;Ramdani, Kawalek, & Lorenzo, 2009).”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Hitt et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X.
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2002-07
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
71-98
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W2146740775
Cited by
877
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 62
FWCI
50.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, business value, firm performance, productivity, Tobin's Q, market valuation, IT investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review