Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)software systems integrate key business and management processes within and beyond a firm's boundary.Although the business value of ERP implementations has been extensively debated in trade periodicals in the form of qualitative discussion or detailed case studies, there is little large-sample statistical evidence on whether the benefits of ERP implementation exceed the costs and risks. With multiyear multi-firm ERP implementation and financial data, we find that firms that invest in ERP tend to show higher performance across a wide variety of financial metrics. Even though there is a slowdown in business performance and productivity shortly after the implementation, financial markets consistently reward the adopters with higher market valuation (as measured by Tobin's q). Due to the lack of mid- and long-term post-implementation data, future research on the long-run impact of ERP is proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical evidence confirms that SMEs' dream to improve market positioning and to take advantage of governments' support programs have lately precipitated SMEs to adopt ERP in some economies.
“empirical evidence confirms that their dream to improve market positioning and to take advantage of governments' support programs have lately precipitated SMEs to adopt ERP in some economies (Hitt et al., 2002;Lall & Teyarachakul, 2006;Ramdani, Kawalek, & Lorenzo, 2009).”
From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Hitt et al., 2002
Cites
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451 · see citing works
Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data
Hitt, L. M. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.134 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921 · see citing works
“Existing post-implementation studies mainly focus on ascertaining their organizational impact of ERP systems and consequently their business value (e.g., Gattiker and Goodhue 2005; Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundMelville, N. P., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004) · MIS Q. · doi:10.2307/25148636 · Cited by 3,896 · see citing works
Eftelioglu, E., & Shekhar, S. (2021) · Quantum information & computation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4442-4_1 · Cited by 1,579
“The notion of increasing greenness in urban environments not only connects with the aesthetic evaluation but also show beneficial physiological response compared to spaces with little vegetation [Qin et al. 2013].”
BackgroundFirm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities1
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148729 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“In addition, since larger firms may be in a better position to achieve performance gains due to their ability to gamer scale efficiencies (Hitt et al. 2002), we specity firm size as a control variable.”
BackgroundAntecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations1
Ko, D., Kirsch, L. J., & King (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148668 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth
Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Hendricks, K. B., Singhal, V., & Stratman, J. K. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.002 · Cited by 888 · see citing works
Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance
Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-51804 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
“Besides process automation, ERP systems also distribute timely and accurate data, which provides the basis for information analysis and management decision support (Hitt, Wu, and Zhou 2002).”
MethodCocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software1
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410417 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
“For example, implementation of enterprise software often requires extensive effort to configure it to meet the user’s idiosyncratic needs (Hitt et al. 2002; Ko et al. 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStrength in Numbers: How Does Data-Driven Decisionmaking Affect Firm Performance?Preprint
Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Kim, H. H. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1819486 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
“Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai 2011 3 Closely related to these studies is the emerging literature on the value of enterprise systems, that have shown that investments in ERP (Hitt et al. 2002; Anderson et al. 2003) and combinations of ERP systems with other complementary enterp…”
BackgroundSelf-citationFichman, R. G. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00054 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
“These have included studies of automated teller machines (Dos Santos and Peffers, 1995), enterprise resource planning, (Hitt et al., 2001; McAfee, 2002), electronic data interchange (Mukhopadhyay et al., 1995) and hospital information systems (Devaraj and Kohli, 2003; Kohli and Devaraj, 2003).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGattiker, T. F., & Goodhue, D. L. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148695 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
“Manajer perlu membuat keputusan dasar mengenai integrasi dari interdependensi.”
BackgroundInformation Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence
Mithas, S., Tafti, A., Bardhan, I., & Goh, J. (2012) · MIS Q. · doi:10.2307/41410414 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance
Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0118 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
“ERP implementation and organizational performance (Hitt et al. 2002), studies have yet to examine ERP implementations in an integrative way by linking them to implementation effort and organizational performance.”
BackgroundResultMüller, O., Fay, M., & Brocke, J. V. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
“the BDA dummy variable can be interpreted as the percent productivity change associated with owning BDA assets [4, 30].”
BackgroundOh, & Pinsonneault, A. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148790 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems
Grabski, S. V., Leech, S. A., & Schmidt, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.37 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships1
Klein, R., & Rai, A. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650325 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Larger firms also enjoy potential advantages in exploiting the resource endowments of smaller partners and in influencing their information-sharing behaviors (Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundBig Data Investment, Skills, and Firm Value
Tambe, P. B. (2014) · Management Sciences · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2294077 · Cited by 449
“Earlier work measures the returns to specific technologies using data collected from firms or software vendors (e.g. Hitt, Wu, and Zhou 2002).”
Relational Antecedents of Information Flow Integration for Supply Chain Coordination
Patnayakuni, R., Rai, A., & Seth, N. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230101 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
“In addition, since larger firms have greater available resources and power to influence the level of coordination among supply chain partners, we specify firm size as a control variable [81].”
BackgroundCritical factors for successful ERP implementation: Exploratory findings from four case studies
Motwani, J. G., Subramanian, R., & Gopalakrishna, P. (2005) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.02.005 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
“The first provides comprehensive overview of ERP systems (Appleton 1997, Bowman 1997, [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]) and focuses on the fundamental corporate capabilities driving ERP as a strategic concept [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23].”
BackgroundPlant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, and Plant Performance
Banker, R., Bardhan, I., Chang, H.-H., & Lin, S.-P. (2006) · MIS Q. · doi:10.2307/25148733 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Bharadwaj, S. G., Bharadwaj, A., & Bendoly, E. (2007) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0148 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
“In addition to process automation and visibility, which reduce errors and delays associated with manual processes, integrated information systems for manufacturing enable improved decision making as well as improved interactions with supply chain partners (Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundCurtin, J. P., Kauffman, R. J., & Riggins, F. J. (2007) · Inf. Technol. Manag. · doi:10.1007/s10799-007-0010-1 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
External Knowledge and Information Technology: Implications for Process Innovation Performance1
Trantopoulos, K., von Krogh, G., Wallin, M. W., & Wörter, M. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.15 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Stoel, M. D., & Muhanna, W. A. (2009) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.10.002 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
“[26] analysis of the association between a firm’s Tobin’s q value and ERP implementation.”
BackgroundInfluentialThree-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology
Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, L. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
“Following the literature on IT productivity (Brynjolfsson and Hitt 1996, 2003; Hitt et al. 2002; Aral et al. 2006), we adopt a Cobb–Douglas specification.”
BackgroundMethodEnterprise systems and ongoing process change
Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Cantrell, S. (2004) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150410518301 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
“We found that contrary to popular opinion and research treating implementation as complete (Hitt et al., 2002), most organizations that we studied are still implementing ES functionality (see Figure 1).”
ResultRanganathan, C., & Brown, C. (2006) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0084 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Nicolaou, A. (2004) · The Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2004.18.2.79 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
“Hunton et al. (2003) collected a sample of 63 ERP-adopting firms and examined the longitudinal impact of ERP adoption on firm performance.”
BackgroundEnterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Moon, Y. B. (2007) · International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1504/ijmed.2007.012679 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
“The companies which have implemented ERP systems and are relatively satisfied with their operations are now considering the extension of the functionalities provided by the original ERP systems.”
BackgroundData Analytics, Innovation, and Firm Productivity
Wu, L., Hitt, L., & Lou, B. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Productivity of Information Technology Investments: New Evidence from IT Labor Data
Tambe, P. B., & Hitt, L. (2012) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0398 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
“…10, ∗∗ p < 0 (cid:48) 05, ∗∗∗ p < 0 (cid:48) 01. this finding, including that enterprise systems (e.g., SAP) are disproportionately employed in larger firms and have significant effects on productivity (Hitt et al. 2002) or simpler arguments such as economies of scale in IT purchasing or deployment.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMeasuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard
Chang, J., & King, W. R. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045833 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“…most of the prior instruments were developed prompted the inclusion of new items to measure the IS function’s performance in seven new areas: ERP [51], knowledge management [45, 64, 97], electronic business [9, 55], customer relationship management [39], supply chain management [37], electronic…”
BackgroundXue, Ray, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703465 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners
Love, P., Matthews, J., Simpson, I., Hill, A., & Olatunji, O. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.007 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
“Benefits such as reduced capital costs due a reduction in scope changes and clash detection will be readily identifiable, but those of strategic and organizational nature may not come to fruition early in project life [1,31].”
BackgroundMorton, N. A., & Hu, Q. (2008) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.008 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Enterprise resource planning survey of Korean manufacturing firms
Katerattanakul, P., Hong, S.-G., & Lee, J. (2006) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/01409170610717835 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
“Despite its high implementation and maintenance cost, the ERP system has become the de facto solution in industry to realise an enterprise-wide information system (Hitt et al., 2002).”
BackgroundRam, J., Corkindale, D. R., & Wu, M. (2013) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.032 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post-implementation changes
Nicolaou, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2006) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2005.12.002 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
“: +1 419 372 2932; fax: +1 419 372 2875. resses: anicol@cba.bgsu.edu (A.I. Nicolaou), sbhatt@fau.edu (S. Bhattacharya).”
Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications
Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & McGaughey, R. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.002 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“Numerous researchers have incorporated tangibles in operational and tactical level IT/IS evaluations (Some of them are: Anandarajan and Wen, 1999; Clemons, 1991; Ezingeard et al., 1999; Farbey et al., 1994; Grover et al., 1998; Irani and Love, 2001; Hitt et al., 2002; Love and Irani, 2001; Sethi et al., 1993; Small an…”
BackgroundInfluentialDewan, S., Shi, C., & Gurbaxani, V. (2007) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0739 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
“have even higher failure rates (Hitt et al. 2002).”
Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution
Awa, H. O., Ukoha, O., & Emecheta, B. C. (2016) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2016.1196571 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
“, 2009), empirical evidence confirms that their dream to improve market positioning and to take advantage of governments’ support programs have lately precipitated SMEs to adopt ERP in some economies (Hitt et al., 2002; Lall & Teyarachakul, 2006; Ramdani, Kawalek, & Lorenzo, 2009).”
BackgroundThe influence of organizational factors on successful ERP implementation
Dezdar, S., & Ainin, S. (2011) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741111143603 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
The Internet of Things: a security point of view
Li, S., Tryfonas, T., & Li, H. (2016) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-07-2014-0173 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Kleindorfer, P., & Wu, D.-J. (2003) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1597.20583 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
“The issues include whether and under what conditions ERP systems have paid off (Hitt et al. 2002), and the requirements to achieve fully linked or networked organizations for interacting with close supply chain partners and arms-length market participants.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAn Updated ERP Systems Annotated Bibliography: 2001-2005Preprint
Esteves, J., & Bohórquez, V. (2007) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1006969 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
“(Hitt et al., 2002) explain the business impact of ERP implementation on a wide variety of performance measures and empirically test for the productivity and business performance effects of ERP on firms that adopted ERP versus those that did not.”
BackgroundCotteleer, M. J., & Bendoly, E. (2006) · MIS Q. · doi:10.2307/25148743 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
“Hitt et al. 2002; McAfee 2002) in that it reinforces the notion that these systems can enable significant improvements in firm performance upon deployment.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBradley, J. (2008) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2008.04.001 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
“Hitt et al. (2002) demonstrate that firms which invest in ERP show “higher performance across a wide variety of financial metrics.””
BackgroundERP implementation at SMEs: analysis of five Canadian cases
Snider, B., da Silveira, G. D., & Balakrishnan, J. (2009) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570910925343 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
“As the duration since going live increases, more categories of project benefits tend to be realized (Markus et al., 2000a; Hitt et al., 2002; McAfee, 2002; Gattiker and Goodhue, 2005; Weider et al., 2006,).”
BackgroundERP system implementation in large enterprises—A systematic literature review
Ali, M., & Miller, L. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2014-0071 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework
Awa, H. O., & Ojiabo, O. U. (2016) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-03-2015-0068 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software represents one of such state-of-the-art information technologies that integrate managerial and operational processes within and beyond the traditional boundaries (Ahituv et al., 2002; Hitt et al., 2002; Shiau et al., 2009).”
BackgroundExamining the Potential Benefits of Internal Control Monitoring Technology
Masli, A. N. S., Peters, G. F., Richardson, V. J., & Sanchez, J. M. (2010) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.1001 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
“…of the difficulty lies in the fact that researchers have attempted to link broad IT implementations to broad financial measures of either stock market reaction (e.g., Hayes et al. 2001; Dehning et al. 2003) or firm profitability (e.g., Hitt et al. 2002; Hunton et al. 2003; Kobelsky et al. 2008).”
Understanding the Impact of Collaboration Software on Product Design and Development
Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R., & Asdemir, O. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0104 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
“We note that our representation of CPC as a dummy variable is similar to the approach proposed by Hitt et al. (2002) where ERP implementation was modeled as a dummy variable.”
Which Came First, IT or Productivity? The Virtuous Cycle of Investment and Use In Enterprise SystemsPreprint
Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, D. (2006) · International Conference on Interaction Sciences · doi:10.2139/ssrn.942291 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
“The study by Hitt et al. (2002), which was the largest published statistical analysis of the productivity and performance implications of ERP adoption, examines 350 publicly traded U.”
InfluentialSelf-citationChen, C. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-12-2017-1236 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Bajwa, D. S., Garcia, J. E., & Mooney, T. (2004) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2004.11647585 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“Empirical evidence also suggests that ERP assimilation improves availability of information and integration of business operations (32) and organizations making investments in ERP tend to have higher financial performance as well as higher market valuation than those that do not invest in ERP (25).”
BackgroundBusiness value of social media technologies: Evidence from online user innovation communities
Dong, J. Q., & Wu, W.-F. (2015) · Journal of strategic information systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.04.003 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
“Second, we contribute to the literature on the business value of IT (e.g., Aral and Weill, 2007; Bardhan et al., 2013; Hitt and Brynjolfsson, 1996; Hitt et al., 2002; Mithas et al., 2012) by theorizing and testing the distinct effects of OUIC-enabled ideation capability and OUIC-enabled…”
BackgroundInformation Technology Impacts on Firm Performance: An Extension of Kohli and 1
Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.4.4 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
“…share growth Technology use 50.00 *Bresnahan et al. (2002) L-P Value added IT stock 100.00 Davis et al. (2002) C-P Cycle time Role of Strategic IT 100.00 Hitt et al. (2002) L-S Market value, value added, COGS, Sales, Output, Pretax income ERP implementation 100.00 Konings & Roodhooft (2002) C-P…”
BackgroundInfluentialAppropriability Mechanisms and the Platform Partnership Decision: Evidence from Enterprise Software
Huang, P., Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., & Wu, D. J. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1618 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
“Enterprise software consolidates the diverse information needs of an enterprise’s departments together into a single, integrated software program that operates on a shared database (Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationValue Implications of Investments in Information Technology
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R., & Ravindran, S. (2006) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0542 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
“Following Hitt et al. (2002), who evaluated the impact of ERP systems on company performance for companies that implemented SAP during this time period, we included a number of alternative earnings based performance measures.”
MethodOrganizational adoption of enterprise resource planning systems: A conceptual framework
Başoğlu, N., Daim, T. U., & Kerimoglu, O. (2007) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2007.03.005 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Examine ERP post-implementation stages of use and value: Empirical evidence from Portuguese SMEs
Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T., & de Castro, M. (2014) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2014.01.002 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K.-H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2011) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222280305 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“, number of employees) as a control variable as it affects organizational ability in developing information integration because larger firms tend to enjoy scale efficiency in information sharing [38] and they have more resources to support the development of intra- and interorganizational information integration [101].”
BackgroundThe Effect of Enterprise Systems Implementation on the Firm Information EnvironmentPreprint
Dorantes, C., Li, C., Peters, G. F., & Richardson, V. J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1526521 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
“Prior empirical studies examining the benefits of ES primarily focus on broad operating performance measures and provide mixed evidence (e.g., Poston and Grabski 2001; Hitt et al. 2002; Hunton, Lippincott, and Reck 2003; Nicolaou 2004; Chapman and Kihn 2009).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Effect of ERP System Implementations on the Management of Earnings and Earnings Release Dates
Brazel, J. F., & Dang, L. (2008) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2008.22.2.1 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“The potential advantages of ERP systems (e.g., assisting business process reengineering, reducing complications with Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance) have made them the system of choice among many corporations (O’Leary 2000; Bradford and Roberts 2001; Winters 2004).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe influence of ERP system implementation on the operational performance of an organization
Madapusi, A., & D’Souza, D. E. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.06.004 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Adoption of Enterprise Application Software and Firm Performance
Shin, I. (2006) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-005-0215-9 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Ravichandran, T., Liu, Y., Han, S., & Hasan, I. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250407 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
“Recent studies in the IS literature have posited and found that IT reduces internal coordination costs [36, 60, 61], enables effective knowledge transfer across business units, and generally helps create synergies across business units [123].”
BackgroundMethodWei, H.-L., Wang, E. T. G., & Ju, P.-H. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000547 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“…enterprise resource planning system; misalignment; organizational change; cascading effect Introduction Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software has received much attention from both practitioners and academics (Hitt et al., 2002; Robey et al., 2002; Stratman & Roth, 2002).”
BackgroundBelvedere, V., Grando, A., & Bielli, P. (2013) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.648278 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“One of the main purposes in introducing ICTs in organisations is process automation, i.e. deploying technology to standardise and improve processes (Davenport 1993, Grover and Malhotra 1997, Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundWong, C. W. Y., Lai, K., & Bernroider, E. W. N. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.005 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Staff, C. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3061359 · Cited by 149
Supply chain management and financial performance: literature review and future directions
Shi, M., & Yu, W. (2013) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2012-0112 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
How Do Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Affect Firm Risk? Post-Implementation Impact1
Tian, F., & Xu, S. X. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.03 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
“Third, as ERP system scope increases, more value chain processes can adapt in concert, on an ERP system platform, to address changes in the firm's operating environment (Hitt et al. 2002; Ranganathan and Brown 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShen, Y.-C., Chen, P.-S., & Wang, C.-H. (2016) · Computers in industry (Print) · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.05.006 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Ke, W., Tan, C., Sia, C. L., & Wei, K. (2012) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290308 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The role of IS capabilities in delivering sustainable improvements to competitive positioning
Doherty, N., & Terry, M. J. (2009) · Journal of strategic information systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2009.05.002 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“[Brynjolfsson & Hitt; 1996 Hitt et al, 2002].”
Huang, P., Tafti, A., & Mithas, S. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13490 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“Enterprise software products are highly businessprocess oriented and usually need to be customized to fit specific business practices, where idiosyncratic local needs tend to drive complementary user innovations in workplaces (Hitt et al. 2002; Von Hippel 2005).”
BackgroundERP system usage and benefit: A model of antecedents and outcomes
Nwankpa, J. K. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.019 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Why are enterprise resource planning systems indispensable to supply chain management?
Su, Y.-Q., & Yang, C. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.003 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“…Mollenkopf, 2004; Byrd and Davidson, 2003; Gunasekaran et al., 2004) or by confirming the relationship between ERP implementation and firm performance (Hendricks et al., 2007; Mabert et al., 2001, 2003a; McAfee, 2002; Hitt et al., 2002; Gupta and Kohli, 2006; Ehie and Madsen, 2005; Kalling, 2003).”
InfluentialWang, L., Gwebu, K. L., Wang, J., & Zhu, D. X. (2008) · The Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2008.22.1.125 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Market reactions to E-business outsourcing announcements: An event study
Agrawal, M., Kishore, R., & Rao, H. (2006) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.08.002 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“Such studies are becoming common in the literature; e.g., the effect of CIO changes [12], IT infrastructure investments, IT investments [18,28], ERP systems [26] and E-commerce [51].”
BackgroundEvaluating the impact of IT investments on productivity: a causal analysis at industry level
Hu, Q., & Quan, J. (2005) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.10.006 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Kohli, R., Devaraj, S., & Ow, T. T. (2012) · MIS Q. · doi:10.2307/41703502 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“Along these lines, the market may delay bestowing value solely based upon announcements to mitigate the potential risk, especially for expenditures (e.g., ERP) that have had mixed results (Hitt et al. 2002; Im et al. 2001).”
BackgroundResultDevelopment of measures to assess the ERP adoption of small and medium enterprises
Shiau, W., Hsu, P., & Wang, J. (2009) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390910922859 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“training and other internal staff costs – 10 percent (Hitt et al., 2002).”
BackgroundHeim, G. R., & Peng, D. X. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.005 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“Hitt et al. (2002) find that ERP adoption is positively related to production output and sales, yet negatively related to the cost of goods sold.”
BackgroundMethodERP Misfit: Country of Origin and Organizational Factors
Wang, E. T. G., Klein, G. L., & Jiang, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230109 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A Multi-Level Approach to Measuring the Benefits of an Erp System in Manufacturing Firms
Gefen, D., & Ragowsky, A. (2004) · Information systems management · doi:10.1201/1078/44912.22.1.20051201/85735.3 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“Showing such a positive relationship is important because it affects MIS Still, whether investment in ERP systems pays off remains a controversial question (Hitt et al. 2002; Sarkis and Sundarraj 2003; Kalling, 2003).”
Coping with ERP-related contextual issues in SMEs: a vendor's perspective
Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2004) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2004.11.006 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“However, the benefits of ERP cannot be easily acquired and inconsistent ERP outcomes have been reported (Hayes et al., 2001; Hitt et al., 2002; Hunton et al., 2002; Mandal and Gunasekaran, 2002; Palaniswamy and Frank, 2000; Vogt, 2002).”
Do business process reengineering projects payoff? Evidence from the United States
Ozcelik, Y. (2010) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.03.004 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“Such a specification has been used in past research as it provides flexibility in the relationship between the numerator and the denominator, while still retaining the interpretation as a performance measure [51].”
MethodERP evaluation during the shakedown phase: lessons from an after‐sales division
Häkkinen, L., & Hilmola, O. (2007) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00261.x · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“…quantitative empirical evidence, it was quite apparent that ERP users perceived system success to be relatively low, which, as such, is not surprising taking into account that the case division was going through the shakedown phase (cf. Nah et al ., 2001; Hitt et al ., 2002; Yusuf et al ., 2004).”
BackgroundGarcía-Morales, V., Martín-Rojas, R., & Lardón-López, M. E. (2018) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-04-2017-0123 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
From Association to Causation via a Potential Outcomes Approach
Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0184 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“These include initiatives such as implementation of enterprise or related IT systems (e.g., ERP, CRM, or SCM systems), the IT-enabled outsourcing of business processes, and many other marketing or strategic actions (Hitt et al. 2002, Mithas et al. 2005, Ray et al. 2005).”
BackgroundBardhan, I. R., Mithas, S., & Lin, S. (2007) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00293.x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“…and Wu 2006; Banker et al. 2006; Choudhury, Hartzel, and Konsynski 1998; Cotteleer 2006; Cotteleer and Bendoly 2006; Dibbern et al. 2004; Hitt, Wu, and Zhou 2002; McAfee 2002; Mithas and Jones 2007; Whitaker, Mithas, and Krishnan 2007), none of these studies have investigated the role…”
BackgroundImplementation of Knowledge Management Systems and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation
Feng, K.-C., Chen, E. T., & Liou, W.-C. (2005) · Journal of Computational Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2005.11645835 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems
Silva, L., & Backhouse, J. (2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00041 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships
Klein, R. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.03.001 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Information Technology as an Enabler of Growth in Firms: An Empirical Assessment
Mitra, S. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045847 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“Recent research has focused on the complementary nature of IT [51], investments in enterprise systems [19], and managerial perceptions of IT [44].”
Background
- Authors
- Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-98
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2146740775
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 50.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, business value, firm performance, productivity, Tobin's Q, market valuation, IT investment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review