Impacts of disparate policing in Indian Country
Abstract
Like most racialised minority groups, Native Americans have long experienced disparate policing, both in the form of over- and under-policing their communities. Inevitably, the interactions between police and Native Americans shape the latter's perceptions of the brand of justice they can expect. Cumulatively, over- and under-policing reinforce the antipathy if not outright hostility towards police. They compound the historically strained relationship between Native Americans and the western criminal justice system. Yet the impacts of disparate policing also have broader community and political effects, including over-representation in the justice system, disempowerment, segregation and enhanced risk of victimisation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perry (2009) found that interactions with non-Native American police reinforced hostility and distrust.
“(b) interactions with non-Native American police reinforced hostility and distrust;”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
Perry (2009) found that overrepresentation of Native Americans in criminal justice contact was salient to the Native American subjects.
“Among the themes regarding non-Native American police emerging from Perry's (2009) interviews were (a) overrepresentation of Native Americans in criminal justice contact was salient to the Native American subjects;”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
Perry (2009) found that interactions with police fostered perceptions of Native American marginality and alienation.
“(c) interactions with police fostered perceptions of Native American marginality and alienation.”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
A general sense of suspicion and hostility from law enforcement has been reported among interviewed Native populations within the reservation system.
“Overall, a general sense of suspicion and hostility from law enforcement has been reported among interviewed Native populations within the reservation system (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Koshy et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
This spatial policing is felt as a type of enforced segregation.
“This spatial policing is felt as a type of enforced segregation (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Koshy et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
This expectation of suspicion and hostility contributes to the lack of desire for law enforcement involvement, even where necessary, within many Native communities.
“This expectation of suspicion and hostility contributes to the lack of desire for law enforcement involvement, even where necessary, within many Native communities (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Koshy et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
The catalog of research on Native carceral inequalities in the US is still in the early stages of development.
“While the catalog of research on Native carceral inequalities in the US is still in the early stages of development, studies have nonetheless been conducted demonstrating the disparities in carceral system involvement and outcomes faced by Native people (see Munoz and McMorris 2002;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Jeffries and Bond 2012;Janisch 2014;Saperstein et al. 2014;Tighe 2014;Mebane-Cruz 2015;Cunne”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
For Native people, spatial policing can mean being policed when exiting their Native Nations, their reservation communities.
“For Native people, this can mean being policed when exiting their Native Nations, their reservation communities (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009)).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
Interviews have indicated experiences of at best culturally inept, and at worst outright dismissive, even racist behavior from non-tribal law enforcement within Native communities.
“Beyond the jurisdictional confusions, interviews have indicated experiences of at best culturally inept, and at worst outright dismissive, even racist behavior from non-tribal law enforcement within Native communities (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009)).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
These studies implicate overarching US settler colonial structural factors common to Native individuals and communities which enable, if not entail, these inequalities as part-and-parcel of maintaining settler colonial and capitalist stratifications.
“Further, these studies implicate the overarching US settler colonial structural factors common to Native individuals and communities which enable, if not entail, these inequalities as part-andparcel of maintaining the stratifications that settler colonial (and capitalist) power depend upon (Munoz and McMorris 2002;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Jeffries and Bond 2012;Janisch 2014;Saperstein et al. 2014;T”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
Studies have been conducted demonstrating disparities in carceral system involvement and outcomes faced by Native people.
“While the catalog of research on Native carceral inequalities in the US is still in the early stages of development, studies have nonetheless been conducted demonstrating the disparities in carceral system involvement and outcomes faced by Native people (see Munoz and McMorris 2002;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Jeffries and Bond 2012;Janisch 2014;Saperstein et al. 2014;Tighe 2014;Mebane-Cruz 2015;Cunne”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
It is argued that ultimately crimes implicating white victims are the target of more severe penalties for Native offenders.
“Thus, it is argued that ultimately it is crimes implicating white victims that are the target of more severe penalties for Native offenders (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Nielson and Jarratt-Snider 2018;Stewart et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
This finding must be contextualized in light of the evidence of overpolicing of Native people, which increases the chance of carceral system involvement among Native people.
“However, this finding must be contextualized in light of the evidence of overpolicing of Native people (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Lantz and Ward 2023), which thus increases the chance of carceral system involvement among Native people.”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
Negative stereotypes perceiving Native people as inherently violent and intemperate reinforce and compel their experiences of increased scrutiny and punitiveness within the US carceral system.
“the obviously negative stereotypes perceiving Native people as inherently violent and intemperate reinforce and compel their experiences of increased scrutiny”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2009
Cites
Tribal Policing: Asserting Sovereignty, Seeking Justice
Luna-Firebaugh, E. (2007) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1prsrpj · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda
Ulmer, J. T., & Bradley, M. S. (2019) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024805 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Tabbutt, K. (2025) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.70123 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perry, B.
- Affiliations
- Ontario Tech University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Perry, Barbara
- Venue
- Policing and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-281
- ISSN
- 1043-9463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2728
- OpenAlex
- W1991704726
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policing & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- Native Americans, Indian Country, over-policing, police-community relations, racialized minorities, criminal justice system, disempowerment, segregation, victimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review