The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Examining the nature and extent of public participation in neighbourhood policing
Abstract
Situated within the ‘New Localism’ agenda neighbourhood policing, a contemporary form of community policing operating in England and Wales, has sought to increase citizen participation in shaping the direction of local policing. Whilst public participation has been viewed as central for the operation of community policing by its advocates, others have been much more critical about what can be achieved. Concerns have been raised that participation has been low and ‘regressive’ rather than ‘progressive’ in its effect. Using binary logistic regression models constructed from Crime Survey for England and Wales (formerly British Crime Survey) data, this study confirms that the majority of the population do not participate and demonstrates that awareness of and participation in neighbourhood policing are shaped by an interaction of factors related to demography, the life course, neighbourhood attachments, facets of social class, perceptions of crime and disorder and attitudes to the police. We conclude that while neighbourhood policing is likely to be consumed by the ‘usual suspects’, there is also evidence that neighbourhood policing does not have a wholly regressive effect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While it is too early to come to a definitive assessment of the implications of the two police reforms, the trajectory of change presented in this paper clearly stands in stark contrast to claims made in some jurisdictions regarding the emergence of a 'new localism' in policing (see McLaughlin, 2007;Bullock and Sindall, 2014).”
From Mind the implementation gap? Police reform and local policing in the Netherlands and Scotland (2015) · cites this paper as Bullock and Sindall, 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1016/S0890-4065(01)00036-6 · DOI
- 10.1086/377517 · DOI
- 10.1080/0735648X.1996.9721544 · DOI
- 10.1177/0011128794040003008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00490.x · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226327358.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1080/10439460600662148 · DOI
- Hope T., 1995, Building a safer society: strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and justice, 19, 21
- 10.1093/police/paq027 · DOI
- 10.1177/1748895807082059 · DOI
- Innes M., 2004, Criminal justice, 4, 151, 10.1177/1466802504044914 · DOI
- 10.1080/10439460600670877 · DOI
- Innes M., 2002, Sociological research, 7
- 10.1093/bjc/azs032 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00014.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1982.tb00473.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716206286723 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9299.00264 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00392.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0011128705284155 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00484.x · DOI
- 10.1093/police/pam036 · DOI
- Rochester C., 2010, Volunteering and society in the 21st century, 10.1057/9780230279438 · DOI
- 10.1086/210356 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0011128789035003008 · DOI
- Skogan W., 1997, Community policing: Chicago style, 10.1093/oso/9780195105605.001.0001 · DOI
- Slovic P., 1992, Social theories of risk, 117
- Stoker G., 2006, Why politics matters: making democracy work
- 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bjc/azq011 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470773215.ch4 · DOI
- Tyler T., 2006, Why people obey the law?, 10.1515/9781400828609 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215 · DOI
- Wilson J., 1982, The Atlantic monthly, 29
- Whiteley P., 2012, Political participation in Britain: the decline and revival of civic culture, 10.1007/978-0-230-35849-2 · DOI
Cited by
Mind the implementation gap? Police reform and local policing in the Netherlands and Scotland
Terpstra, J., & Fyfe, N. R. (2015) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895815572162 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Bullock, K., & Sindall, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sindall, K.
- Venue
- Policing and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-404
- ISSN
- 1043-9463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2728
- OpenAlex
- W1985618969
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policing & Society (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- neighbourhood policing, citizen participation, community policing, new localism, social class, neighborhood attachment, life course, demography, regressive effects, England and Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the nature and extent of public participation in neighbourhood policing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10439463.2013.844130
- The paper
- Bullock, K., & Sindall, K. (2014). Examining the nature and extent of public participation in neighbourhood policing. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.844130