Cited by 2,973Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and PenologyPublic Policy and Administration Research

The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing

Sunshine, Jason, Tyler, Tom R.·2003·Law & Society Review

Abstract

This study explores two issues about police legitimacy. The first issue is the relative importance of police legitimacy in shaping public support of the police and policing activities, compared to the importance of instrumental judgments about (1) the risk that people will be caught and sanctioned for wrongdoing, (2) the performance of the police in fighting crime, and/or (3) the fairness of the distribution of police services. Three aspects of public support for the police are examined: public compliance with the law, public cooperation with the police, and public willingness to support policies that empower the police. The second issue is which judgments about police activity determine people's views about the legitimacy of the police. This study compares the influence of people's judgments about the procedural justice of the manner in which the police exercise their authority to the influence of three instrumental judgments: risk, performance, and distributive fairness. Findings of two surveys of New Yorkers show that, first, legitimacy has a strong influence on the public's reactions to the police, and second, the key antecedent of legitimacy is the fairness of the procedures used by the police. This model applies to both white and minority group residents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Law & Society Review
Published
2003-09
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
513-547
ISSN
  • 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5893
OpenAlex
W1991829326
Cited by
2,973
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 167 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 260 · 2021: 214 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 230 · 2018: 179 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 158 · 2015: 166 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 78
FWCI
79.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Law & Society Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
procedural justice, police legitimacy, public support for policing, cooperation with police, risk perception, police performance, distributive fairness, racial differences in perception, New York City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review