Cited by 66Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilitySocial Robot Interaction and HRI

An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human–Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users

Brinkley, Julian, Posadas, Brianna, Sherman, Imani, Daily, Shaundra B., Gilbert, Juan E.·2019·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

Fully autonomous or “self-driving” vehicles are an emerging technology that may hold tremendous mobility potential for individuals who are visually impaired who have been previously disadvantaged by an inability to operate conventional motor vehicles. Prior studies however, have suggested that these consumers have significant concerns regarding the accessibility of this technology and their ability to effectively interact with it. We present the results of a quasi-naturalistic study, conducted on public roads with 20 visually impaired users, designed to test a self-driving vehicle human–machine interface. This prototype system, ATLAS, was designed in participatory workshops in collaboration with visually impaired persons with the intent of satisfying the experiential needs of blind and low vision users. Our results show that following interaction with the prototype, participants expressed an increased trust in self-driving vehicle technology, an increased belief in its likely usability, an increased desire to purchase it and a reduced fear of operational failures. These findings suggest that interaction with even a simulated self-driving vehicle may be sufficient to ameliorate feelings of distrust regarding the technology and that existing technologies, properly combined, are promising solutions in addressing the experiential needs of visually impaired persons in similar contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brinkley, J., Posadas, B., Sherman, I., Daily, S. B., & Gilbert, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Brinkley, Julian
Venue
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Published
2019-01-08
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
1018-1032
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W2910687140
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, human-machine interaction, visually impaired users, blind and visually impaired users, accessibility, technology acceptance, participatory design, mobility for people with disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review