Cited by 8Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Accessible Maps for the Future of Inclusive Ridesharing

Open access
Fink, Paul D. S., Milne, Hannah, Caccese, Anthony, Alsamsam, Maher, Loranger, Jacob, Colley, Mark, Giudice, Nicholas A.·2024·Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

Abstract

For people who are blind and low vision (BLV), ridesharing provides an important means of independence and mobility. However, a common challenge relates to finding the vehicle when it arrives to an unanticipated location. Although coordinating with the driver for assistance is serviceable in the near term, new solutions are necessary when a human is no longer available in future automated vehicles. Therefore, this paper presents and evaluates a multisensory smartphone-based map system designed to enable nonvisual tracking of summoned vehicles. Results from a user study with (N=12) BLV users suggest that vibro-audio maps (VAMs) promote superior spatial confidence and reasoning compared to current nonvisual audio interfaces in ridesharing apps, while also being desirable and easy to use. A subsequent expert evaluation based on improvements suggested during the user study indicate the practical utility of VAMs to address both current and future wayfinding challenges for BLV travelers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3640792.3675736

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AV accessibility projects have leveraged techniques including haptic access, augmented visual information, spatialized audio, and vibro-audio maps to enhance situation awareness and improve task completion during AV trips.

    “AV accessibility projects have leveraged myriad techniques including haptic access [7, 17, 18], augmented visual information [11], spatialized audio [5, 10], and the latest class of multisensory maps that combine vibration and audio, known as vibro-audio maps (VAMs)[20] to enhance situation awareness and improve task completion during AV trips [13].”

    From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion ('Spatial Reasoning for Situational Awareness'; page not supplied) links improved spatial understanding while waiting for a ride to the goal of situational awareness. It explicitly says the study examined only pre-journey tasks, not travel in the vehicle. The User Study Results (page not supplied) found no significant VAM advantage on the measured vehicle-tracking task, so improved task completion during AV trips is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent results emphasize the utility of multisensory information in AVs for BLV users.

    “given recent results emphasizing the utility of multisensory information in AVs for BLV users [13, 17, 18].”

    From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion reports that vibro-audio maps improved BLV participants’ confidence in locating a vehicle and supported spatial reasoning compared with audio-only interfaces. But its Spatial Reasoning for Situational Awareness section says the study examined waiting for a ride in a controlled setting; utility during travel in automated vehicles remains a subject for future work. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The time to learn new haptic interfaces is a common finding across the literature.

    “The time to learn new haptic interfaces is a common finding across the literature [7, 13]”
  • Recent work has shown that VAMs have improved spatial confidence and reasoning for BLV users in tracking and navigating to rideshared vehicles over unimodal, audio-only interfaces.

    “Indeed, recent work has shown that VAMs have improved spatial confidence and reasoning for BLV users in tracking and navigating to rideshared vehicles over unimodal, audio-only, interfaces [13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Ranjbar P, Krishnakumari PK, Andersson J and Klingegård M 2022. Vibrotactile guidance for trips with autonomous vehicles for persons with blindness, deafblindness, and deafness. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 15, (Sep. 2022), 100630. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100630. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fink, P. D. S., Milne, H., Caccese, A., Alsamsam, M., Loranger, J., Colley, M., & Giudice, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maine (US)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-09-22
Volume
2024
Pages
106-115
OpenAlex
W4402433265
Cited by
8
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01EY035433-01)
  • National Science Foundation (HCC-IIS2312402)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
accessible maps, ride-sharing, blind and visually impaired users, multisensory interfaces, mobile application, wayfinding, autonomous vehicles, inclusive mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review