Blind and Visually Impaired Users’ Interactions with Digital Libraries: Help-Seeking Situations in Mobile and Desktop Environments
Abstract
With the goal of developing information retrieval (IR) systems, including digital libraries (DLs), that support universal access, the authors conducted two studies to identify the help-seeking situations that blind and visually impaired (BVI) users encountered in DLs. First, the authors quantitatively compared BVI users’ help-seeking situations when interacting with the DL's mobile website (M.Web) and the mobile app (M.App). Using multiple data collection methods, the mobile study identified six situations BVI users faced more frequently when using M.Web than M.App. Second, the findings of the mobile study were qualitatively compared with the situations that occurred in the desktop environment, highlighting eight unique situations. It is more difficult for BVI users to interact with DLs in the mobile environment because of the reduced size of the mobile interface, complex DL structures, dynamic elements, diverse formats, and sight-centered design. Specific design recommendations were offered to enhance DLs in the mobile environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only the authors' prior pilot study reported help-seeking situations faced by BVI users in their interactions with DLs, but that study only involved one DL and used one device type.
“Only our prior pilot study [2] reported help-seeking situations faced by BVI users in their interactions with DLs, but that study only involved one DL and used one device type.”
From Help-Seeking Situations Related to Visual Interactions on Mobile Platforms and Recommended Designs for Blind and Visually Impaired Users (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Icon-based features/elements, such as toggle-based search features, prevent BVI users from accessing and using these features/elements, thus disrupting their interaction process.
“Icon-based features/elements, such as toggle-based search features, prevent BVI users from accessing and using these features/elements, thus disrupting their interaction process.”
From Help-Seeking Situations Related to Visual Interactions on Mobile Platforms and Recommended Designs for Blind and Visually Impaired Users (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Xie, I., Wang, S., Lee, T. H., & Lee, H. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Iris
- Venue
- International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-09-28
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6953-6971
- ISSN
- 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7590
- OpenAlex
- W4387183493
- Semantic Scholar
- bacf26758e0222d983c5b2c56a5c6e832bc570d0
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- IMLS Leadership (LG-70-16-0038)
- University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- blind and visually impaired users, digital libraries, help-seeking, mobile accessibility, mobile internet, mobile application, universal access, accessible design, mobile interface design, information retrieval systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review