Cited by 9AI in Service InteractionsConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceDigital Marketing and Social Media

Research on the Interactive Effects of Product Recommendation Approaches and Product Types on Consumers’ Purchase Intention–Regulation of Product Involvement

Li, Zhifang, Shi, Ziqing·2026·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

The main purpose is to analyze how different product recommendation approaches and product types influence consumers’ purchasing decisions, elucidate the interactive effects between these variables, and develop platform-specific operational strategies to optimize recommendation systems. Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) theory and the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), this study employs a 2 (product recommendation type: AI vs. human) × 2 (product type: functional vs. hedonic) between-subjects experimental design to examine how recommendation systems interact with product characteristics to influence consumers’ purchase intentions. Specifically, it examines the mediating role of perceived value and the moderating effect of product involvement. An inter-group experimental design was employed to gather data via online questionnaires. ANOVA and other statistical methods were used to analyze the interaction, mediation, and moderation effects among the variables. The findings indicate a significant interaction between recommendation mode and product type. AI recommendations are more effective for functional products, whereas human recommendations are more advantageous for hedonic products. Perceived value mediates this interaction, with quality and price value being predominant in the AI recommendation pathway, while emotional, quality, and price value drive the human recommendation pathway. Moreover, the interaction effect is moderated by product involvement, with th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2025.2584725

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low involvement decreases the negative impact of AI on purchase intent for functional or hedonic products.

    “On the other hand, according to Li and Shi (2025), low involvement decreases the negative impact of AI on purchase intent for functional or hedonic products.”
  • Prior studies either manipulate disclosure without varying the true source or compare recommendation modes without crossing the source label, leaving unclear whether purchase intent is caused by the AI label, AI generation, or misaligned source labels.

    “The studies above either manipulate disclosure without varying the true source (Kučinskas, 2025;Bui, 2025) or compare recommendation modes without crossing the source label (Li & Shi, 2025;Song et al., 2024).It's unclear whether the purchase intent is caused by the AI label, AI generation, or misaligned source labels.”
  • The current data show that transparent AI labelling reduces trust and intent for snacks, but the difference is smaller than for laptops.

    “The current data show that transparent AI labelling reduces trust and intent for snacks, but the difference is smaller than for laptops, which supports Li and Shi's (2025) claim that low involvement reduces cue discrimination.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., & Shi, Z.
Affiliations
Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Zhifang
Venue
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Published
2025-11-13
Volume
42
Issue
13
Pages
10365-10383
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W4416194455
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Henan Province Higher Education Institutions Philosophy and Social Sciences Innovation Talent Support Program (2023-CXRC-32)
  • The Annual Project of Henan Province Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning (2022CZH016)
  • The Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (SKJZD2022-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
product recommendation, product type, functional products, hedonic products, purchase intention, product involvement, perceived value, recommender systems, e-commerce platforms, stimulus-organism-response model, elaboration likelihood model, matching effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review