Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Capitalism, nature, socialism a theoretical introduction∗

O'Connor, James·1988·Capitalism Nature Socialism

Abstract

Summary This article expounds the traditional Marxist theory of the contradiction between forces and relations of production, over‐production of capital and economic crisis, and the process of crisis‐induced restructuring of productive forces and production relations into more transparently social, hence potentially socialist, forms. This exposition provides a point of departure for an “ecological Marxist”; theory of the contradiction between capitalist production relations and forces and the conditions of production, under‐production of capital and economic crisis, and the process of crisis‐induced restructuring of production conditions and the social relations thereof also into more transparently social, hence potentially socialist, forms. In short, there may be not one but two paths to socialism in late capitalist society. While the two processes of capital over‐production and underproduction are by no means mutually exclusive, they may offset or compensate for one another in ways which create the appearance of relatively stable processes of capitalist development. Study of the combination of the two processes in the contemporary world may throw light on the decline of traditional labor and socialist movements and the rise of “new social movements”; as agencies of social transformation. In similar ways that traditional Marxism illuminates the practises of traditional labor movements, it may be that “ecological Marxism”; throws light on the practices of new social movements…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10455758809358356

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Polanyi Karl, 1967, The Great Transformation
  2. 1987, Our Common Future
  3. Schnaiberg Alan, 1980, The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity
  4. Timberlake Lloyd, 1985, Socialist Review, 84
  5. Lebowitz Michael, 1982, Studies in Political Economy, 7
  6. Sayer Derek, 1987, The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytical Foundations of Historical Materialism
  7. Marotto Robert, 1984, “Forces and Relations of Production”
  8. Polin Marino, 1979, international Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 3
  9. 1982, Limits to Capital
  10. Knight David, 1987, The Age of Science
  11. Fiske Edward B., 1988, International Herald Tribune
  12. Postel Sandra, 1988, World Watch, 4
  13. Daggett Christopher J., 1988, The New York Times
  14. Wilkinson R.G., 1973, Poverty and Progress: An Ecological Perspective on Economic Development
  15. Sunkel O., 1986, International Social Science Journal, 109, 413
  16. Laclau Ernesto, 1985, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
  17. Albert Michael, 1986, Liberating Theory
  18. O'Connor James, 1978, Kapitalistate, 7
  19. Offe Claus, 1987, Scandanavian Political Studies, 10, 234

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
O'Connor, J.
Venue
Capitalism Nature Socialism
Published
1988-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
11-38
ISSN
  • 1045-5752
  • 1548-3290
Cited by
460
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review