Cited by 51

Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Models of Prevention: Why Does My School—and District—Need an Integrated Approach to Meet Students’ Academic, Behavioral, and Social Needs?

Lane, Kathleen Lynne, Oakes, Wendy P., Menzies, Holly M.·2014·Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth

Abstract

In this introductory article, the authors provide an overview of and rationale for comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models of prevention—one approach to integrated tiered systems of support. The authors (a) describe core features of comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models; and (b) discuss associated benefits, emphasizing those for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. The authors conclude by providing a brief overview of the articles in this special issue, which collectively offer a step-by-step process for designing, implementing, evaluating, and sustaining comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models in schools and school districts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1045988x.2014.893977

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., & Menzies, H. M.
Venue
Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth
Published
2014-05-12
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
121-128
ISSN
  • 1045-988X
  • 1940-4387
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review