Cited by 9Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportHigher Education Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of Campus Mentors, an alternative school–university partnership

Wasburn-Moses, Leah, Noltemeyer, Amity·2018·Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth

Abstract

Finding new ways to serve youth at risk is critical to the field of education. A model alternative school–university partnership was created in concert with youth-mentoring evidence-based practices. The current study evaluates student outcomes from the program's first six years. Data on students' grades, credits earned, and behavior are reported. Analyses reveal significant improvements in grade-point average and credits earned by program-participating students. Significant improvements in disciplinary incidents are also noted, but are not consistent across all analyses. Results suggest that the program has promise for improving outcomes for youth at risk. Limitations and future directions are presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1045988x.2017.1413534

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Burns R. W., 2016, School–University Partnerships, 81
  2. 10.1353/etc.0.0060 · DOI
  3. DuBois D. L., 2011, Association for Psychological Science, 12, 57
  4. 10.1080/1045988X.2016.1254083 · DOI
  5. Hodgman M., 2016, Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning, 10, 28
  6. Holen M. C., 2014, Educational Considerations, 49
  7. Institute for Education Sciences, 2006, Intervention: Check and connect
  8. Institute for Education Sciences, 2008, Dropout prevention: Overview
  9. Meyers L. S., 2006, Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation
  10. Mottaz C., 2002, Breaking the cycle of failure: How to build and maintain quality alternative schools
  11. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, 2010, Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers
  12. Nelson L., 2009, Duncan Urges Colleges to Help Underperforming Schools More. The Chronicle of Higher Education
  13. Prior N., 2013, Juvenile justice and alternative education: A life course assessment of best practices
  14. Quinn M. M., 2006, Study of effective alternative education programs: Final grant report
  15. Raywid M. A., 1999, Education Digest, 64, 47
  16. 10.1080/02667363.2014.891101 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/10911359.2014.897102 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Tabachnick B. G., 2001, Using multivariate statistics
  19. 10.1080/08878730.2015.1041313 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wasburn-Moses, L., & Noltemeyer, A.
Affiliations
Miami University (US)
Corresponding author
Wasburn-Moses, Leah
Venue
Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth
Published
2018-03-22
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
190-197
ISSN
  • 1045-988X (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4387
OpenAlex
W2790865063
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
university-school partnership, at-risk youth, mentoring, alternative schools, student academic outcomes, grade point average, disciplinary incidents, student behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review