The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias
Abstract
Social psychological research has repeatedly shown that perceivers draw correspondent dispositional inferences from observed behaviour even when this behaviour was highly constrained by situational factors (i.e., the correspondence bias). Even though this phenomenon has been proposed to be multiply determined, the most common explanation is still that perceivers ubiquitously consider situational factors to have little impact on human behaviour (i.e., the fundamental attribution error). The present chapter offers a critical analysis of the available empirical evidence on the correspondence bias from the perspective of theory-based bias correction. It is concluded that the correspondence bias results from a number of different processes associated with the application of perceivers' causal theories about situational influences on human behaviour. However, there is no evidence for the assumption that the correspondence bias is due to causal theories implying that situational factors have little impact on human behaviour. Theoretical and empirical implications are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Journal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,751
Behavioral Study of obedience.
Milgram, S. (1963) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040525 · Cited by 4,918 · cited 4×
“…number of studies demonstrating strong situational influences on the tendency to engage in immoral behaviour, such asMilgram’s studies on obedience (Milgram, 1963), Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment (Haney, Banks, & Zimbardo, 1973), or Darley and Latané’s studies on bystander intervention…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025589 · Cited by 3,083 · cited 2×
“…between empirical and definitional propositions can be further illustrated by the common reaction to studies demonstrating a strong impact of situational factors on moral behaviour (e.g., Darley & Batson, 1973; Darley & Latané, 1968; Haney et al., 1973; Latané & Darley, 1968; Milgram, 1963).”
BackgroundIronic processes of mental control.
Wegner, D. M. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.34 · Cited by 2,609
The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3604 · Cited by 2,205
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21 · Cited by 1,897
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.377 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.27 · DOI
- Gilbert DT, 1995, Attribution and interpersonal perception
- Haney C., 1973, International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.345 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.377 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.219 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.873 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–162 of 162
The psychology of conspiracy mentality
Imhoff, R. (2025) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2025.10.002 · Cited by 3
Revisiting Spontaneous Trait Inferences: Questions, Challenges, and Intradisciplinary Connections
Degner, J. (2025) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70072 · Cited by 3
Владиславович, Ч. С. (2021) · Полис Политические исследования · doi:10.17976/jpps/2021.05.08 · Cited by 3
Obedience to robot. Humanoid robot as an experimenter in Milgram paradigm
Grzyb, T., Maj, K., & Doliński, D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100010 · Cited by 3
Sander, C., & Degner, J. (2023) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13011 · Cited by 4
Hypocrisy judgements are affected by target attitude strength and attitude moralization
Vaughan‐Johnston, T. I. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3018 · Cited by 3
“As Gawronski (2004) articulated in his work on theory-based corrections,peoplemayfailtoadequatelyaccommodatesituationalexpla-nations in their attributions (1) because they lack sufficient knowledge of a situational lay theory, (2) because they fail to adequately apply situational theory to a given…”
BackgroundObserving Obedience: How Sophisticated are Social Perceivers?
Monroe, A. E., & Reeder, G. D. (2014) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12077 · Cited by 4
“In a detailed review of the fundamental attribution error, Gawronski (2004) found no overall trend for perceivers to prefer dispositional causes to situational causes. Instead, the evidence pointed to a perceiver who engages in quite sophisticated thinking (incorporating thought about situations) when dispositional in…”
BackgroundUleman, J. S., & Sarıbay, S. A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.15 · Cited by 3
Jumping to Conclusions: Advocacy and Application of Psychological ResearchPreprint
Mitchell, G. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 3
The Influence of Mood on Attribution
Avramova, Y. R., Stapel, D. A., & Lerouge, D. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210381083 · Cited by 2
“Although this tendency has been explained in different ways (see, e.g., Gawronski, 2004; Gilbert, 1998; Krull, 2001, for overviews), one of the most basic and parsimonious accounts explains attribution biases in terms of perceptual salience.”
BackgroundRetractedBierwiaczonek, K., Waldzus, S., & van der Zee, K. I. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611630 · Cited by 2
“…may add complexity to preexisting representations of locals; reduce uncertainty, intergroup anxiety, and threat (Stephan and Stephan, 1996; Riek et al., 2006); and decrease the probability of attributing negative traits through correspondence bias (Gilbert and Malone, 1995; Gawronski, 2004).”
BackgroundWerth, L., Denzler, M., & Mayer, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53897-5_5 · Cited by 2
Soziale Wahrnehmung und Attribution
Parkinson, B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65297-8_3 · Cited by 4
Rouda, B. C. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression · doi:10.1080/19434472.2024.2370770 · Cited by 2
“The human instinct to search for patterns discourages the acceptance of unexplainable phenomena, encouraging the assignation of blame to a specific party regardless of their realistic responsibility for the situation (Gawronski, 2004).”
Teoria(s) da atribuição: um quadro explicativo para o rendimento acadêmico
Ferreira, M. (2019) · Revista Brasileira de Educação · doi:10.1590/s1413-24782019240037 · Cited by 2
Contextualization of Mental Representations and Evaluative Responses
Ye, Y., & Gawronski, B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199348541.003.0008 · Cited by 2
Self-citationIdeological Diversity and Cognitive Difficulties
Mihăilescu, B. C., & Grecu, S.-P. (2018) · Cited by 2
Psychological disorder diagnosis is no cure for trait inferences bias
Jacinto, S., Braga, J. N., Ferreira, M. S., Collins, E. C., Krendl, A. C., & Lewis, C. C. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12821 · Cited by 2
“However, these adjustments tend to be insufficient (Gilbert, 1998, 2002; Gilbert & Malone, 1995; Gilbert et al., 1988; Quattrone, 1982; Trope & Gaunt, 2000), leaving a weaker personality attribution (for a review, see Gawronski, 2004).”
BackgroundHuang, L., & Harrison, K. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2022.2141298 · Cited by 2
“As individuals typically make trait inferences based on the firm’s statements, actions, policies, or procedures (Gawronski, 2004; Wagner et al., 2020), we can expect that moral hypocrisy may change an individual’s CSR beliefs about that firm due to the perceptions on inconsistent beneficiaries and…”
BackgroundThe Causes and Effects of Inferences of Impression Management in Consumption
Pancer, E. (2013) · QSpace (Queen's University Library) · Cited by 2
Fundamental Attribution Error/Correspondence Bias
Reeder, G. D. (2013) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0114 · Cited by 2
Di, M., Wang, X., Zhao, J., Wei, F., Jianbao, Z., Nguyen, K., & Wang, Y. (2019) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2019.1703632 · Cited by 2
“…on the conclusion that the initial dispositional inference of CB is a relatively automated process that occurs without an individual’s intention or awareness (Uleman, Saribay, & Gonzalez, 2008), whereas the situational correction stage involves a more controlled process (Gawronski, 2003, 2004).”
BackgroundThe Content of Our CharacterPreprint
Brown, T. R. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3665288 · Cited by 2
Without his cookies, he’s just a monster: A counterfactual simulation model of social explanationPreprint
Brockbank, E., Yang, J., Govil, M., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3wzbk · Cited by 2
Attributionstheorien und Suche nach Ursachen sozialer Ereignisse
Garms-Homolová, V. (2021) · Psychologie für Studium und Beruf · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62922-2_3 · Cited by 1
Frampton, J. R., & Smith, W. R. (2025) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2025.2602653 · Cited by 1
“Most CIT research has examined clear, intentional behaviors such as freely chosen divergent opinions or choices in controlled tasks (Gawronski, 2004; Gilbert & Malone, 1995).”
Wagerman, S. A. (2015) · Cited by 1
Free trade refugees: from Chiapas to the prairie
Silva, M. I. (2016) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Iglesias, F., Franco, V. R., Gisler, J. V. T., et al. (2017) · Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/0102-3772e323226 · Cited by 1
Causal Inference in the Clinical Setting: Why the Cognitive Science of Folk Psychology Matters
Sims, A. (2018) · Contributions to phenomenology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98646-3_11 · Cited by 1
Webinar satisfaction factors in the stories of participants
Czahajda, R. (2022) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12275 · Cited by 2
Lanning, M. D. (2011) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 1
Social inference and the evolution of the human brain
Koscik, T. R. (2010) · doi:10.17077/etd.c68zajh0 · Cited by 1
“For example, if the behaviour in question is highly diagnostic of a certain attribute, the bias may be more prominent than when diagnosticity is low (Gawronski, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the Robustness and Generality of the Correspondence BiasPreprint
Sharek, Z. S., Swift, S. A., & Moore, D. A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2305876 · Cited by 1
Coherent Attributions with Co-occurring and Interacting Causes
Jennings, K. E. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Self Distancing and Human Reflection: Overcoming Bias in Judgment and Emotional Reasoning.
Bremner, R. H. (2013) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
O paradigma de atribuição de atitudes
Hagá, S. (2013) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.680
“2 Um outro paradigma tem sido referido como paradigma de estudo do enviesamento correspondente (ver e.g., Gawronski, 2004): o paradigma de atribuição moral (e.g., Bierbrauer, 1979).”
BackgroundThe influence of controllability and causal status on counterfactual thinking and associated affect
Jenkins, M. R. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20318388
Fiore, R., & Lee, L. (1970) · Journal of Business Strategies · doi:10.54155/jbs.37.1.1-28
The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Oil? On the Interpersonal Effects of Boredom Expression
Gonzalez, M. F. (2020) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Ergüder, L. (2020) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc1707413
Teaching about Cultural Differences in the Correspondence Bias
Koenig, A. M., & Dean, K. K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316996706.020
Pursiainen, C., & Forsberg, T. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79887-1_5
Schneider, T. (2023) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20230315ts · Cited by 1
Gomide, C. P., Perez, W. F., & Pessôa, C. V. B. B. (2024) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100735
Braga, J., & Jacinto, S. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2379
A Cross-Cultural Method in Social and Personality Psychology
Oishi, S., & Üskül, A. K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170123.006
Researchers aren't the story: why we should cite theories and findings, not people
Körner, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1663529
“In social psychology, this is similar to the fundamental attribution error (or correspondence bias, Gawronski, 2004).”
En experimentstudie om möjligheten att reducera det fundamentala attributionsfelet
Düring, M., & Nordgren, A. (2015) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)
Puzakova, M., Grinstein, A., & Becker, M. (2025) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1177/10949968251413529
“…also indicates that people have a fundamental tendency to attribute others ’ behaviors to stable traits rather than to unstable contextual in fl uences (Gawronski 2004), because it is easier to make personal attributions than to consider a more complex set of situational factors (Newman and Langer…”
The Right to Traditional Knowledge and Language
Bello‐Bravo, J., Lutomia, A. N., Medendorp, J. W., & Pittendrigh, B. R. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03360-4_6
Moving beyond the progressive idol of the cavern in modern islamophobia research
Conway, L. G. (2026) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-025-09660-0
“If the Fundamental Attri-bution Error turns out not to be so fundamental, then we have an obligation to rename it the more benign-sounding correspondence bias (Gawronski, 2004 ).”
Lay Attributions of Conspiracy Beliefs Predict Intentions to Correct Conspiracy Believers
Mang, V., Epstude, K., & Fennis, B. M. (2026) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672261418068
Zhang, Y., Wang, B., Yang, F., Liao, Y., Ma, X., & Su, S. (2026) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-026-01174-y
“Scholars have called this common cognitive bias as the fundamental attribution error (Gawronski, 2004; Lyubykh et al., 2022).”
Bertrand, A. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/216d3647z78bcz4c68z9ba9z2d0a029cf1b4 · Cited by 1
In Search of a Negativity Bias in Expectancy ViolationPreprint
Gawronski, B., & Brannon, S. M. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Self-citationNow You See Them, Now You Don't: Understanding New Hire Ghosting and Its Antecedents
Speer, A. B., Hardy, J. H., Gibson, C., Frost, C., & Hong, Q. (2026) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.70050
(2014) · Digital Commons-DePaul (DePaul University) · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Gawronski, B.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gawronski, Bertram
- ORCID
- Gawronski, Bertram
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-217
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W1963540280
- Semantic Scholar
- 6e093027038bcaa0cdf314a6b2b91acd94aa12cc
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 133
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- correspondence bias, fundamental attribution error, dispositional inference, causal theories, social perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
