The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity
Abstract
Person-based factors influence a range of meaningful life outcomes, including intergroup processes, and have long been implicated in explaining prejudice. In addition to demonstrating significant heritability, person-based factors are evident in expressions of generalised prejudice, a robust finding that some people (relative to others) consistently score higher in prejudice towards multiple outgroups. Our contemporary review includes personality factors, ideological orientations (e.g., authoritarianism), religiosity, anxiety, threat, disgust sensitivity, and cognitive abilities and styles. Meta-analytic syntheses demonstrate that such constructs consistently predict prejudice, often at the upper bounds of effect sizes observed in psychological research. We conclude that prejudice theories need to better integrate person- and situation-based factors, including their interaction, to capture the complexity of prejudice and inform intervention development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agreeableness and openness to experience are significant predictors of more positive attitudes toward immigrants.
“there is evidence to suggest that agreeableness and openness to experience are significant predictors of more positive attitudes toward immigrants”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Hodson & Dhont 2015
Neuroticism is a significant predictor of more negative attitudes toward immigrants.
“whereas neuroticism is a significant predictor of more negative attitudes (Gallego & Pardos-Prado 2014, Hodson & Dhont 2015).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Hodson & Dhont 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 179 · Cited by 244
- Authors
- Hodson, G., & Dhont, K.
- Affiliations
- Brock University (CA)
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hodson, Gordon
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-42
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W1601299688
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 179
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 81.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- prejudice, individual differences, heritability, personality, authoritarianism, religiosity, anxiety, threats, disgust sensitivity, cognitive ability, cognitive style, person-situation interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review