Cited by 244Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPersonality Traits and Psychology

The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity

Hodson, Gordon, Dhont, Kristof·2015·European Review of Social Psychology

Abstract

Person-based factors influence a range of meaningful life outcomes, including intergroup processes, and have long been implicated in explaining prejudice. In addition to demonstrating significant heritability, person-based factors are evident in expressions of generalised prejudice, a robust finding that some people (relative to others) consistently score higher in prejudice towards multiple outgroups. Our contemporary review includes personality factors, ideological orientations (e.g., authoritarianism), religiosity, anxiety, threat, disgust sensitivity, and cognitive abilities and styles. Meta-analytic syntheses demonstrate that such constructs consistently predict prejudice, often at the upper bounds of effect sizes observed in psychological research. We conclude that prejudice theories need to better integrate person- and situation-based factors, including their interaction, to capture the complexity of prejudice and inform intervention development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agreeableness and openness to experience are significant predictors of more positive attitudes toward immigrants.

    “there is evidence to suggest that agreeableness and openness to experience are significant predictors of more positive attitudes toward immigrants”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Hodson & Dhont 2015

  • Neuroticism is a significant predictor of more negative attitudes toward immigrants.

    “whereas neuroticism is a significant predictor of more negative attitudes (Gallego & Pardos-Prado 2014, Hodson & Dhont 2015).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Hodson & Dhont 2015

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 179 · Cited by 244

Authors
Hodson, G., & Dhont, K.
Affiliations
  • Brock University (CA)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Hodson, Gordon
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2015-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-42
ISSN
  • 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-277X
OpenAlex
W1601299688
Cited by
244
References
179
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 1
FWCI
81.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
prejudice, individual differences, heritability, personality, authoritarianism, religiosity, anxiety, threats, disgust sensitivity, cognitive ability, cognitive style, person-situation interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review