The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sources of Supply Chain Disruptions, Factors That Breed Vulnerability, and Mitigating Strategies
Abstract
The focus of business toward increasing efficiency and reducing costs has resulted in supply chains that are efficient during normal times, but at the cost of being vulnerable to disruptions. From time to time, frequent as well as rare catastrophes also disrupt supply chain operations. We collect and compile data from many sources and show that there has been a marked increase in both the frequency and economic losses from natural and man-made catastrophes. We find that business losses constitute a major percentage of the total losses caused by these catastrophes. The statistics suggest that for terrorist attacks, the vulnerability of U.S. business interests is much higher than others. Examination of the geographical and chronological distributions of catastrophes provides useful information for managers concerned about such disruptions. We develop a catastrophe classification framework that matches different types of catastrophes to a variety of infrastructural components of supply chains. The framework also connects a variety of mitigating strategies to appropriate catastrophe types. We identify factors that can be used to assess the vulnerability of a supply chain. They can also be useful to compare possible alternative decisions based on the vulnerability they may cause in the supply chain. To manage vulnerability in supply chains, we propose strategies that can be implemented by a company to decrease the possibility of occurrence, provide advance warning, and cope after a disturbance. We reveal potential benefits from mitigating strategies during normal times, which indicate that well-developed strategies can also result in better efficiency. We identify many future research areas concerning disruption handling in supply chains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882 · Cited by 404
Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of procurement
Roberta Pereira, C., Christopher, M., & Lago Da Silva, A. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-09-2013-0346 · Cited by 396
Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation
Macdonald, J. R., Zobel, C. W., Melnyk, S. A., & Griffis, S. E. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Stecke, K. E., & Kumar, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Channels
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06-26
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-226
- ISSN
- 1046-669X (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7039
- OpenAlex
- W2006485295
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources of Supply Chain Disruptions, Factors That Breed Vulnerability, and Mitigating Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10466690902932551
- The paper
- Stecke, K. E., & Kumar, S. (2009). Sources of Supply Chain Disruptions, Factors That Breed Vulnerability, and Mitigating Strategies. Journal of Marketing Channels. https://doi.org/10.1080/10466690902932551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.