Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation
Abstract
The research literature of supply chain risk and resilience is at a critical developmental stage. Studies have established the importance of these topics both to researchers and practitioners. They also have identified factors contributing to risk, the impact of risk and disruptions on performance, and the strategies and tactics used to build the capacity for supply chain resilience. Although these efforts can provide support for constructing a theory of risk and resilience, researchers are currently restricted in their ability to build such a theory by the difficulty of collecting the necessary data. This paper contributes to this literature development effort by summarising prior research reviews and developing a three-component framework aimed at helping researchers to build better theories. This is accomplished through combining structured experimental design with discrete-event simulations of supply chains. The result is a methodology that allows researchers to develop better understanding of the factors that link a disruption to its impact on supply chain performance through both direct and interaction effects. Following the methodology development, the paper concludes with an example using the factors of shock interarrival time, supply chain connectivity and buffer stocks to illustrate the potential for contributing to the theory-building process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizational resilience is valuable to help businesses plan, prepare, strategize operations, and respond to unpredictable disruptions and efficiently recover from such disruptions.
“Organizational resilience is valuable to help businesses plan, prepare, strategize operations, and respond to unpredictable disruptions and efficiently recover from such disruptions (Scholten et al., 2019, Macdonald et al., 2018, Bag et al., 2021b).”
From Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework (2023) · cites this paper as Macdonald et al., 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
- Authors
- Macdonald, J. R., Zobel, C. W., Melnyk, S. A., & Griffis, S. E.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Macdonald, John R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4337-4355
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2781702579
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- supply chain risk, supply chain resilience, theory development, supply chain disruption, supply chain performance, discrete event simulation, supply chain connectivity, safety stock, interaction effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review