The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Opening Windows on Air Change Rates in Two Homes
Open accessAbstract
More than 300 air change rate experiments were completed in two occupied residences: a two-story detached house in Redwood City, CA, and a three-story townhouse in Reston, VA. A continuous monitor was used to measure the decay of SF6 tracer gas over periods of 1-18 hr. Each experiment first included a measurement of the air change rate with all exterior doors and windows closed (State 0), then a measurement with the single change from State 0 conditions of opening one or more windows. The overall average State 0 air change rate was 0.37 air changes per hour (hr(-1)) (SD = 0.10 hr(-1); n = 112) for the California house and 0.41 hr(-1) (SD = 0.19 hr(-1); n = 203) for the Virginia house. Indoor/outdoor temperature differences appeared to be responsible for the variation at the Virginia house of 0.15-0.85 hr(-1) when windows were closed. Opening a single window increased the State 0 air change rate by an amount roughly proportional to the width of the opening, reaching increments as high as 0.80 hr(-1) in the California house and 1.3 hr(-1) in the Virginia house. Multiple window openings increased the air change rate by amounts ranging from 0.10 to 2.8 hr(-1) in the California house and from 0.49 to 1.7 hr(-1) in the Virginia house. Compared with temperature differences and wind effects, opening windows produced the greatest increase in the air change rates measured in both homes. Results of this study indicate the importance of occupant window-opening behavior on a home's air change rate and the consequent need to incorporate this factor when estimating human exposure to indoor air pollutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WALLACE, L. A., EMMERICH, S. J., & HOWARD-REED, C. (2002) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500229 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Cited by
Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants
Nazaroff, W. W., & Weschler, C. J. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040 · Cited by 846
Window opening behaviour modelled from measurements in Danish dwellings
Andersen, R., Fabi, V., Toftum, J., Corgnati, S. P., & Olesen, B. W. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.005 · Cited by 300
WALLACE, L. A., EMMERICH, S. J., & HOWARD-REED, C. (2002) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500229 · Cited by 260
Self-citationWichmann, J., Lind, T., Nilsson, M. A.-M., & Bellander, T. (2010) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.023 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard-Reed, C., Wallace, L. A., & Ott, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-159
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-2247
- 2162-2906
- OpenAlex
- W1982730656
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Opening Windows on Air Change Rates in Two Homes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470775
- The paper
- Howard-Reed, C., Wallace, L. A., & Ott, W. R. (2002). The Effect of Opening Windows on Air Change Rates in Two Homes. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470775
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.