The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separation and Capture of CO2from Large Stationary Sources and Sequestration in Geological Formations—Coalbeds and Deep Saline Aquifers
Open accessAbstract
The topic of global warming as a result of increased atmospheric CO2 concentration is arguably the most important environmental issue that the world faces today. It is a global problem that will need to be solved on a global level. The link between anthropogenic emissions of CO2 with increased atmospheric CO2 levels and, in turn, with increased global temperatures has been well established and accepted by the world. International organizations such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have been formed to address this issue. Three options are being explored to stabilize atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and global temperatures without severely and negatively impacting standard of living: (1) increasing energy efficiency, (2) switching to less carbon-intensive sources of energy, and (3) carbon sequestration. To be successful, all three options must be used in concert. The third option is the subject of this review. Specifically, this review will cover the capture and geologic sequestration of CO2 generated from large point sources, namely fossil-fuel-fired power gasification plants. Sequestration of CO2 in geological formations is necessary to meet the President's Global Climate Change Initiative target of an 18% reduction in GHG intensity by 2012. Further, the best strategy to stabilize the atmospheric concentration of CO2 results from a multifaceted approach where sequestration of CO2 into geological formations is combined with increased efficiency in electric power generation and utilization, increased conservation, increased use of lower carbon-intensity fuels, and increased use of nuclear energy and renewables. This review covers the separation and capture of CO2 from both flue gas and fuel gas using wet scrubbing technologies, dry regenerable sorbents, membranes, cryogenics, pressure and temperature swing adsorption, and other advanced concepts. Existing commercial CO2 capture facilities at electric power-generating stations based on the use of monoethanolamine are described, as is the Rectisol process used by Dakota Gasification to separate and capture CO2 from a coal gasifier. Two technologies for storage of the captured CO2 are reviewed--sequestration in deep unmineable coalbeds with concomitant recovery of CH4 and sequestration in deep saline aquifers. Key issues for both of these techniques include estimating the potential storage capacity, the storage integrity, and the physical and chemical processes that are initiated by injecting CO2 underground. Recent studies using computer modeling as well as laboratory and field experimentation are presented here. In addition, several projects have been initiated in which CO2 is injected into a deep coal seam or saline aquifer. The current status of several such projects is discussed. Included is a commercial-scale project in which a million tons of CO2 are injected annually into an aquifer under the North Sea in Norway. The review makes the case that this can all be accomplished safely with off-the-shelf technologies. However, substantial research and development must be performed to reduce the cost, decrease the risks, and increase the safety of sequestration technologies. This review also includes discussion of possible problems related to deep injection of CO2. There are safety concerns that need to be addressed because of the possibilities of leakage to the surface and induced seismic activity. These issues are presented along with a case study of a similar incident in the past. It is clear that monitoring and verification of storage will be a crucial part of all geological sequestration practices so that such problems may be avoided. Available techniques include direct measurement of CO2 and CH4 surface soil fluxes, the use of chemical tracers, and underground 4-D seismic monitoring. Ten new hypotheses were formulated to describe what happens when CO2 is pumped into a coal seam. These hypotheses provide significant insight into the fundamental chemical, physical, and thermodynamic phenomena that occur during coal seam sequestration of CO2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purification of Hydrogen by Pressure Swing Adsorption
SIRCAR, S., & GOLDEN, T. C. (2000) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1081/ss-100100183 · Cited by 570
Sleipner vest CO2 disposal, CO2 injection into a shallow underground aquifer
Baklid, A., Korbol, R., & Owren, G. (1996) · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.2118/36600-ms · Cited by 217
Present and past nonanthropogenic CO2 degassing from the solid earth
Kerrick, D. M. (2001) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2001rg000105 · Cited by 200
Cited by
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation
Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F. (2005) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,542
CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications – A review
Olajire, A. A. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.030 · Cited by 1,217
An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion—State of the art research and technology development
Wall, T., Liu, Y., Spero, C., Elliott, L., Khare, S., Rathnam, R., Zeenathal, F., Moghtaderi, B., Buhre, B., Sheng, C., et al. (2009) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2009.02.005 · Cited by 803
Degradation of Well Cement by CO 2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions
Kutchko, B. G., Strazisar, B. R., Dzombak, D. A., Lowry, G. V., & Thaulow, N. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es062828c · Cited by 604
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- White, C. M., Strazisar, B. R., Granite, E. J., Hoffman, J. S., & Pennline, H. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 645-715
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-2247
- 2162-2906
- OpenAlex
- W2054667848
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation and Capture of CO2from Large Stationary Sources and Sequestration in Geological Formations—Coalbeds and Deep Saline Aquifers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466206
- The paper
- White, C. M., Strazisar, B. R., Granite, E. J., Hoffman, J. S., & Pennline, H. W. (2003). Separation and Capture of CO2from Large Stationary Sources and Sequestration in Geological Formations—Coalbeds and Deep Saline Aquifers. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.