Cited by 72Education Discipline and InequalityCriminal Justice and PenologyBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The Cart Before the Horse: The Challenge and Promise of Restorative Justice Consultation in Schools

Open access
Song, Samuel Y., Swearer, Susan M.·2016·Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Abstract

Restorative justice (RJ) in schools is an increasingly popular approach to responding to discipline issues including bullying and aggressive behaviors. However, RJ research in schools is dramatically lagging behind its practice. Specifically, there is a large void within the school consultation literature that examines the use of RJ and the role of the consulting school psychologist. To help address this gap, this article reviews contextual and definitional issues of RJ, introduces the special issue articles within the RJ literature, and provides recommendations for future research, training, and practice in RJ. Notably, this is the first special issue that brings together RJ scholarship and research in schools under a consultation framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10474412.2016.1246972

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lewis, S. (Ed.). (2009). Improving school climate: Findings from schools implementing restora- tive practices. Bethlehem, PA: International Institute for Restorative Practices.
  2. Song, S. Y., & Marth, K. (2013). School culture and climate. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: Conceptual founda- tions and tools for practice (pp. 155-170). New York, NY: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, S. Y., & Swearer, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Song, Samuel Y.
Venue
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation
Published
2016-10
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
313-324
ISSN
  • 1047-4412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-768X
OpenAlex
W2555190409
Cited by
72
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
restorative justice, school consultation, student discipline, bullying, aggression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review