CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology in LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The effects of interaction types on learning outcomes in a blog-based interactive learning environment

Quadir, Benazir, Yang, Jie Chi, Chen, Nian-Shing·2022·Interactive Learning Environments
DOI 10.1080/10494820.2019.1652835
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As the use of online learning has continued to expand, there has been a growing demand for advanced software or social sites that can enhance learning outcomes in online settings. It is important to explore how learner–learner, learner–teacher and learner–content interactions affect on learning outcomes while using the social sites such as Facebook, Twitter, WeChat, Blogs, etc. Although some prior research highlight that there is a demand for interaction in online courses, specific design tactics and empirical evaluation of the effects of interaction on learning outcomes in blog-based courses are lacking. Thus, a blog learning platform named “Learner’s Digest Blog” (LDB) was developed to facilitate the three types of interactions and enhance learning outcomes. A total of 26 learners participated in the blog-based interactive learning environment. The study addressed two research questions, and regression analysis was used to analyze the data. The findings indicated a significant influence between learner–learner interaction, learner–teacher interaction and learner–content interaction on subjective learning outcome. In contrast, there was no significant influence of learner–teacher interaction on objective learning outcomes, but learner–learner and learner–content did significantly affect objective learning outcomes. A significant relationship was also found between students’ subjective and objective learning outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2019.1652835

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Quadir, B., Yang, J. C., & Chen, N.-S.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University of Technology (CN)
  • National Central University (TW)
  • National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Quadir, Benazir
ORCID
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-09-24
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
293-306
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
DOI
10.1080/10494820.2019.1652835
OpenAlex
W2976553412
Cited by
77
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student-student interaction, learner-teacher interaction, learner-content interaction, blog-based learning, online learning, learning outcomes, social learning platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review