Cited by 90Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Phytogenic feed additives mixture enhances the lactational performance, feed utilization and ruminal fermentation of Friesian cows

Kholif, A. E., Hassan, A. A., El Ashry, Ghada M., Bakr, M. H., El-Zaiat, H. M., Olafadehan, O. A., Matloup, O. H., Sallam, S. M. A.·2021·Animal Biotechnology

Abstract

The assay aimed to evaluate the effect of feeding a recently developed phytogenic feed additives mixture in diets of lactating Friesian cows (n = 30; 514 ± 10.1 kg body weight) for 3 months. Cows were stratified into three groups of 10 cows each and fed a control diet alone or the control diet supplemented with the additives mixture at 3 g (PHY3) or 6 g (PHY6)/cow daily. Menthol, levomenthol, β-linaloolm, anethole, hexadecanoic acid and p-menthane were the principle compounds identified in the additives mixture. The PHY3 increased (p < 0.01) intake and nutrient digestibility. PHY3 and PHY6 increased (p < 0.01) ruminal pH, total volatile fatty acids, propionate and acetate. PHY3 and PHY6 improved serum total protein and antioxidant capacity and decreased the concentrations of serum urea-N, triglycerides, total lipids, cholesterol and malondialdehyde (p < 0.05). PHY3 increased milk production and milk content of total solids, protein, lactose and fat. Both PHY3 and PHY6 did not affect mineral concentrations in blood or milk. It is concluded that the inclusion of 3 g/cow/d of feed additives mixture in the lactating Friesian cows diet enhanced milk production and feed utilization, with negative effects observed with increasing the dose of additives mixture to 6 g/cow daily.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10495398.2020.1746322

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 90

Authors
Kholif, A. E., Hassan, A. A., El Ashry, G. M., Bakr, M. H., El-Zaiat, H. M., Olafadehan, O. A., Matloup, O. H., & Sallam, S. M. A.
Affiliations
  • National Research Centre (EG)
  • Agricultural Research Center (EG)
  • Regional Centre for Food and Feed, Agriculture Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
  • Cairo University (EG)
  • Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
  • University of Abuja (NG)
  • Alexandria University (EG)
Corresponding author
Kholif, A. E.
Venue
Animal Biotechnology
Published
2020-04-04
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
708-718
ISSN
  • 1049-5398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2378
OpenAlex
W3014778430
Cited by
90
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
herbal feed additives, Holstein cows, lactation, milk production, rumen fermentation, feed intake, nutrient digestibility, volatile fatty acids, rumen pH, antioxidant capacity, serum biochemistry
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Cattle, Female, Fermentation, Food Additives, Lactation, Rumen, Plant Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review