D.RA.MA: An Extended Conceptualization of Student Anxiety in Criminal Justice Research Methods Courses
Abstract
The challenges of teaching research methods and statistics to students majoring in criminology and criminal justice are well known. The professor has to deal with an array of obstacles among students, including Disinterest, Relevance Argumentation (viewing statistical skills as detached from the “real world”) and Math Anxiety (D.RA.MA). This paper presents the development of an assessment scale to measure the levels of “D.RA.MA” experienced by students enrolled in research methods or statistics courses. The literature is vast on “math anxiety scales.” However, trepidation on the part of criminal justice students who are anticipating their research methods and statistics courses may extend beyond math anxiety. Therefore, the traditional math anxiety scale was extended to include attempts at measuring Disinterest and Relevance Argumentation. Readers are provided with the D.RA.MA scale instrument and data from an assessment of 80 students in criminal justice courses. Assessing this broader student apprehension may serve as an important first step in making the necessary efforts to reduce student apprehension towards these classes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other scholars have identified math anxiety as another factor in student distaste for research methods classes.
“Other scholars have identified math anxiety as another factor in student distaste for research methods classes (e.g., Briggs et al., 2009).”
From Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning (2024) · cites this paper as Briggs et al., 2009
Cites
Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students
Betz, N. E. (1978) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.25.5.441 · Cited by 558 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Unlike the relevance argumentation and disinterest concepts, the reality of math anxiety has been well cited in the literature for many years (see Betz 1978; Pretorius and Norman 1992).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Briggs, L. T., Brown, S. E., Gardner, R. B., & Davidson, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-226
- ISSN
- 1051-1253 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9117
- OpenAlex
- W2086530046
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Criminal Justice Education (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- student anxiety, mathematics anxiety, research methods course, statistics education, criminology students, criminal justice students, disinterest, evaluation scale development, student apprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review