The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Effects of Instructor Service Performance, Immediacy, and Trust on Student–Faculty Out-of-Class Communication
Abstract
Student initiated out-of-class communication (OCC) with instructors has been linked to benefits for students, faculty, and the institution at large, yet garners little attention in business education research. Much of the literature found in communication and higher education research has revolved around the discovery of factors that lead students to engage in OCC. Yet the picture of this process remains far from complete. This article examines key influencers of upper-level business students’ initiation of OCC with their instructors. Several of the predictor variables and the OCC measure itself were found to be multidimensional. Exhibiting certain in-class behaviors, namely, verbal immediacy and strong performance of the education service, while earning students’ trust, encourages students to engage in greater OCC with their instructor. Moreover, results indicate that the relative influence of these factors differs for the two dimensions of OCC (i.e., Personal/Social-Career and For Course Success), indicative of the purpose for discussion sought by the student. Marketing faculty’s use of these in-class communication behaviors should be encouraged and become part of the service culture of the department in its ongoing efforts to attract and retain a healthy share of the business program’s students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“leaving the trust calibration among instructors behind could lead to adverse outcomes [42]”
From Understanding the Practices, Perceptions, and (Dis)Trust of Generative AI among Instructors: A Mixed-methods Study in the U.S. Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.33915/etd.8405 · DOI
- Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. N. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 3, pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
- 10.1177/002224299005400103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03634520302469 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634529909379169 · DOI
- 10.1177/0273475302241002 · DOI
- 10.1080/00221546.2000.11780814 · DOI
- Chow, K. E., Fischer, A. K., & O’Bryan, D. (1995). Patient expectations of dental services. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(3), 23–31.
- 10.1080/03634529009378813 · DOI
- 10.1300/J111v35n04_10 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02310555 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224299205600304 · DOI
- 10.2307/1252256 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299005400306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01463370409370193 · DOI
- 10.1177/0273475300223007 · DOI
- 10.1177/0273475304268782 · DOI
- 10.1080/00909889409365400 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634528809378702 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634529009378815 · DOI
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- 10.1177/0273475399212002 · DOI
- 10.1177/027347539701900102 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634529909379151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0273475302241003 · DOI
- Knapp, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2002). Out-of-class communication: The development and testing of a measure. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, New York City, NY.
- 10.1080/00221546.1995.11774770 · DOI
- Lamport, M. (1993). Student–faculty interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 112, 971–990.
- Lytle, R. S., & Mokwa, M. P. (1992). Evaluating health care quality: The moderating role of outcomes. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 12(1), 4–14.
- 10.1080/15456870.2012.711180 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634529909379163 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634529509379019 · DOI
- Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent passages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s Theory of Involvement and Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 387–400.
- 10.21818/001c.17167 · DOI
- 10.1080/08934210409389382 · DOI
- 10.1080/01463370500102046 · DOI
- 10.1080/10510970009388517 · DOI
- 10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436 · DOI
- 10.2307/1251430 · DOI · Paper page
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(Spring), 12–40.
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Pike, G. R., Schroeder, C. C., & Berry, T. R. (1997). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: The relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 609–621.
- 10.1080/03634528609388318 · DOI
- 10.1080/23808985.1987.11678663 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634529009378814 · DOI
- 10.2307/1250637 · DOI
- Smart, D. T., Kelley, C. A., & Conant, J. S. (2003). Mastering the art of teaching: Pursuing excellence in a new millennium. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 71–78.
- Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149–162.
- 10.1007/BF00976420 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x · DOI
- 10.1080/08824090701446625 · DOI
- 10.2307/2112167 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lyu, W., Zhang, S., Chung, T., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100383 · Cited by 68
“Yet, leaving the trust calibration among instructors behind could lead to adverse outcomes [42].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Faranda, W. T.
- Affiliations
- James Madison University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Faranda, William T.
- ORCID
- Faranda, William T.
- Venue
- Marketing Education Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-05-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-97
- ISSN
- 1052-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 2153-9987
- OpenAlex
- W1508835950
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Marketing Education Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- out-of-class communication, student-instructor communication, verbal immediacy, business students, marketing faculty, student engagement, course success, higher education marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review