Cited by 129Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Treatment challenges associated with comorbid substance use and posttraumatic stress disorder: Clinicians’ perspectives

Open access
Back, Sudie E., Waldrop, Angela E., Brady, Kathleen T.·2009·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

A significant proportion of individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) meet criteria for comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This comorbidity confers a more complicated clinical presentation that carries with it formidable treatment challenges for practitioners. The current study examined sources of difficulty and gratification among clinicians (N = 423) from four national organizations who completed an anonymous questionnaire. As expected, the findings revealed that comorbid SUD/PTSD was rated as significantly more difficult to treat than either disorder alone. The most common challenges associated with treating SUD/PTSD patients included knowing how to best prioritize and integrate treatment components, patient self‐destructiveness and severe symptomatology, and helping patients abstain from substance use. The findings increase understanding of SUD/PTSD treatment challenges, and may be useful for enhancing therapist training programs, supervision effectiveness, and designing optimal SUD/PTSD interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10550490802545141

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Back, S. E., Waldrop, A. E., & Brady, K. T.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Back, Sudie E.
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
15-20
ISSN
  • 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0391
OpenAlex
W2169480510
Cited by
129
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA030143, K23DA021228)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, comorbidities, treatment challenges, clinician perspectives, treatment integration, substance use abstinence, therapist training, clinical supervision
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Emotions, Female, Patient Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Health Care Surveys, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review