Cited by 174Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships

Hughes, Mikayla, Morrison, Kelly, Asada, Kelli Jean K.·2005·Western Journal of Communication

Abstract

Friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) are defined as relationships between cross‐sex friends in which the friends engage in sexual activity but do not define their relationship as romantic. Relationship scholars have only recently begun to examine these relationships, despite their mention in the popular media (e.g., HBO's ‘Sex in the City,’ MTV's ‘True Life,’ ‘Seinfeld,’ and the New York Times). This study explored the relationship between FWBRs and maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network communication and support. Respondents (N = 143) completed self‐report surveys in which they described their FWBRs, their perceived rules for maintenance, perceptions of same‐sex network communication and support, and the current status of their FWBRs. They also completed the short form of the love attitude scale (Hendrick, Hendrick, & Dicke, Citation1998). The findings suggest that people tend to communicate their FWBR experiences to their same‐sex friends and, in general, receive supportive responses. Although attitudes toward love (e.g., agape) did not impact rules for maintenance of FWBRs, attitudes toward love did influence motivations for FWBRs and the outcomes of these relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10570310500034154

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Asada KJK Hughes M Morrison K (2003) Motivations and barriers to friends with benefits relationships Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association San Diego CA
  2. David L (writer) Cherones T (director) (1991) The deal [television series episode] Seinfeld New York: National Broadcasting Company
  3. Lee JA (1973) The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving Don Mills Ontario Canada New Press
  4. Levine TR Aune KS Korallus S (1994) The effects of love styles on relational initiation and intensification strategies Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sydney, Australia
  5. Mongeau PA Ramirez A Vorrell M (2003, February) Friends with benefits: Initial explorations of sexual, non‐romantic relationships Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Communication Association, Salt Lake City, UT
  6. West L Anderson J Duck S (1996) Crossing the barriers to friendships between men and women In J. T. Wood (Ed.) Gendered relationships (pp. 111–127) Mountain View CA Mayfield Publishing Company

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Western Journal of Communication
Published
2005-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
49-66
ISSN
  • 1057-0314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1027
OpenAlex
W1982529238
Cited by
174
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Western Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
friends with benefits, attitudes toward love, agape, social support, relationship motivation, relationship outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review