‘I would just like to be known as an athlete’: managing hegemony, femininity, and heterosexuality in female sport
Abstract
The community of sport is a powerful site for the construction of masculinity, male identities, and heterosexuality. Consequently, the increased entry of women into the sporting arena has been actively resisted, with women athletes either excluded or framed within traditional, sexualized discourses of femininity and heterosexuality. Yet Title IX and increased female participation have been used to suggest that women have achieved sporting empowerment. Thus, elite, professional female athletes provide an interesting position from which to explore the discourses available for women's construction of athletic identities. Using critical discourse analysis with an emphasis on rhetorical and discursive analysis (Potter, 1996 Potter , J. ( 1996 ). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction . London : Sage .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), we analyzed 20 interviews with professional female athletes with a particular interest in exploring the problematic nature of performing female identities given the limited hegemonic forms and resources offered by a predominant and powerful male discourse. Analysis revealed limited ways to construct female athleticism that involved complex and contradictory gender work, including the problematic construction of female athleticism through the deployment of hegemonic discourses that framed ordinary women as nonsporting. Our findings suggest that women athletes remain at the peripheries of the community of sport.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women athletes face pressures to submit to a contrary sexualized discourse within sports that demands players embody femininity and heterosexuality.
“Yet they face pressures to submit to a contrary sexualized discourse within sports that demands players embody femininity and heterosexuality (Mean and Kassing, 2008).”
From Femininities (2015) · cites this paper as Mean and Kassing, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Calow, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.920806 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Windsor, E. J. (2015) · International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.35015-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meân, L. J., & Kassing, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meân, Lindsey J.
- Venue
- Western Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05-20
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-144
- ISSN
- 1057-0314 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1027
- OpenAlex
- W2050332208
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Western Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Keywords
- female athletes, hegemony, femininity, heterosexuality, athletic identity, gendered labor, masculinity, Title IX, women in sport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review