The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame After 9/11
Open accessAbstract
President Bush's initial frame for the attacks of September 11, 2001, overwhelmingly dominated the news. Using that frame as a springboard, this article advances a coherent conception of framing within a new model of the relationship between government and the media in U.S. foreign policy making. The cascading activation model supplements research using the hegemony or indexing approaches. The model explains how interpretive frames activate and spread from the top level of a stratified system (the White House) to the network of nonadministration elites, and on to news organizations, their texts, and the public--and how interpretations feed back from lower to higher levels. To illustrate the model's potential, the article explores the frame challenge mounted by two journalists, Seymour Hersh and Thomas Friedman, who attempted to shift the focus from Afghanistan to Saudi Arabia. As hegemony theory predicts, 9/11 revealed yet again that media patrol the boundaries of culture and keep discord within conventional bounds. But inside those borders, even when government is promoting "war" against terrorism, media are not entirely passive receptacles for government propaganda, and the cascade model illuminates deviations from the preferred frame. As index theorists suggest, elite discord is a necessary condition for politically influential frame challenges. Among other things, the cascade model helps explain whether that condition arises, and how journalists can hinder or advance it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.
Bennett, J. R., Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074220 · Cited by 5,437
Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States
Bennett, W. L. (1990) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x · Cited by 1,815
Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000) · Cited by 1,686
Patterson, T. E. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,293
Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy
Entman, R. M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226210735.001.0001 · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationFraming Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World
(2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410605689 · Cited by 1,170
Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public
Gilliam, F. D., & Iyengar, S. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669264 · Cited by 962
The Art of Political Manipulation, by William H. Riker
Garth, D. L. (1987) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2151420 · Cited by 894
The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality
O'Reilly, K., & Mendelberg, T. (2002) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/3069857 · Cited by 792
Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2000) · Elements of Reason · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805813.009 · Cited by 606
Cited by
The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State
Young, I. M. (2003) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/375708 · Cited by 1,012
The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited
Reese, S. D. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x · Cited by 640
Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161212474472 · Cited by 580
A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model
Reese, S. D., & Shoemaker, P. J. (2016) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268 · Cited by 355
Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects
Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- ENTMAN, R. M.
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 415-432
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W1999642591
- Cited by
- 981
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 43.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame After 9/11. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10584600390244176
- The paper
- ENTMAN, R. M. (2003). Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame After 9/11. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.