The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we address the question of whether disinforming news spread online possesses the power to change the prevailing political circumstances during an election campaign. We highlight factors for believing disinformation that until now have received little attention, namely trust in news media and trust in politics. A panel survey in the context of the 2017 German parliamentary election (N = 989) shows that believing disinforming news had a specific impact on vote choice by alienating voters from the main governing party (i.e., the CDU/CSU), and driving them into the arms of right-wing populists (i.e., the AfD). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the less one trusts in news media and politics, the more one believes in online disinformation. Hence, we provide empirical evidence for Bennett and Livingston’s notion of a disinformation order, which forms in opposition to the established information system to disrupt democracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, detrimental associations were found for trust in governments and politics59,60,66,78–82, trust in media83, and social and institutional trust84.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
In the citing paper
“In a panel survey in Germany, a decline in trust that accompanied increasing digital media consumption was also linked to a turn towards the hard-right populist AfD party80.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314 · cited 1×
“Discriminant validity concerning the different factors was also tested and confirmed based on the Fornell-Larcker criterion (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).”
MethodThe case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · cited 1×
“Interestingly, there is evidence that individuals are more likely to engage in the latter (Kunda, 1990).”
BackgroundExit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States
Schwartz, L. B., & Hirschman, A. (1972) · doi:10.2307/3311348 · Cited by 9,022 · cited 1×
“And third, they could exit the party system entirely through abstention from the vote (Hirschman, 1970; Hooghe, Marien, & Pauwels, 2011).”
BackgroundSocial Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767 · cited 6×
“These placebo news items were meant to control for a possible inflation of the disnews scores in the upcoming analysis (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017, p. 220).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160 · cited 1×
“…from other forms of disinformation (e.g., conspiracy theories) by its distinct news character: By applying news values such as unexpectedness and negativity as well as news formats, disnews purports to hold journalistic credibility (Lazer et al., 2018; Levy, 2017; Tandoc, Lim,&Ling, 2018a, p. 143).”
BackgroundCole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558 · Cited by 3,605 · cited 1×
“In order to benefit from the panel design of our study, we conceptualized it as a so-called autoregressive model with cross-lagged effects (Cole & Maxwell, 2003; Finkel, 1995; Jöreskog, 1979).”
MethodA re-assessment of the concept of political support.
Easton, D. (1975) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400008309 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 2×
“In general, trust in politics refers to “the probability … that the political system (or some part of it) will produce preferred outcomes even if left untended” (Gamson, 1968, p. 54; Easton, 1975, p. 447).”
BackgroundTandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 · Cited by 2,745 · cited 1×
“Especially in the online context, media literacy facilitates authentication of true and rejection of false news (Tandoc et al., 2018b).”
BackgroundFrankel, S. H., Simmel, G., Bottomore, T., & Frisby, D. (1979) · doi:10.2307/2231435 · Cited by 2,453 · cited 1×
“Thus, to trust means that an actor delegates responsibility for a certain action to another actor, though they know that this actor potentially could not meet their expectation (Barber, 1983; Simmel, 2004, pp. 173–181).”
BackgroundStructural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
Byrne, B. M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203807644 · Cited by 2,063
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Ernst N., 2017, International Journal of Communication, 11, 3265
- 10.4135/9781412983594 · DOI
- Gibson T. A., 2018, International Journal of Communication, 12, 3167
- Guess A., 2018, Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign
- Jöreskog K. G., 1979, Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models, 129
- Kline R. B., 2016, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
- Levy N., 2017, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 6, 20
- Luhmann N., 1979, Trust and power
- McFadden D., 1974, Frontiers in econometrics, 105
- Muthén L. K., 2015, Mplus user’s guide
- Pennycook G., 2017, Social Science Research Network
- 10.5964/ejop.v8i2.456 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203481134 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2012 · DOI
- Weedon J., 2017, Information operations and Facebook
- 10.1111/jcom.1224 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007 · Cited by 1,360
“Studies have also found associations between political conservatism and belief in misinformation in the USA [20,44], Chile [121], and Germany [122], but not in Hungary [24], and users who engage in less reasoning have been found to share content from lower-quality news sites on Twitter [71].”
BackgroundA systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348
Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes?
Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220944364 · Cited by 256
Visual disinformation in a digital age: A literature synthesis and research agenda
Weikmann, T., & Lecheler, S. K. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221141648 · Cited by 155
“Longitudinal studies could give even more insights into how a decline of confidence in senses and institutions develops over time (e.g. Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundHow to think about whether misinformation interventions work
Guay, B., Berinsky, A. J., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01667-w · Cited by 138
Orhan, A. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00248-8 · Cited by 152
The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism
Hameleers, M. M. T. L., de Vreese, C. H., Tumber, H., & Waisbord, S. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003004431 · Cited by 140
Is pro-Kremlin Disinformation Effective? Evidence from Ukraine
Erlich, A., & Garner, C. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612211045221 · Cited by 113
“This worsens debates over public policy (Kuklinski et al., 2000) and hampers citizens’ ability to choose elected officials (Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundMasip, P., Suau, J., & Ruiz-Caballero, C. (2020) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2020.sep.27 · Cited by 78
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news
Sindermann, C., Cooper, A. J., & Montag, C. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014 · Cited by 100
“As such, fake news is likely to be used in the course of political campaigns and can influence voting decisions [12] (please also see works on politically oriented news and polarization [13,14]).”
BackgroundHarff, D., Bollen, C., & Schmuck, D. (2022) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2080711 · Cited by 89
“Accordingly, individuals with lower trust in traditional news media have been found to be more inclined to believe misinformation (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020) and to abandon journalistic information (Lazer et al., 2018).”
BackgroundFrom Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their Reporting
Egelhofer, J. L., Aaldering, L., Eberl, J., Galyga, S., & Lecheler, S. K. (2020) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2020.1745667 · Cited by 92
“…a more conscious usage of the term in science as well as in journalism and who have proposed a return to the use of more meaningful notions, such as “disinformation” or simply “false news” (e.g., Egelhofer and Lecheler 2019; HLEG 2018; Wardle and Derakhshan 2017; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
BackgroundThe (Un)Intended Consequences of Emphasizing the Threats of Mis- and Disinformation
Hameleers, M. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i2.6301 · Cited by 81
Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation
Pantazi, M., Hale, S. A., & Klein, O. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12797 · Cited by 81
People believe misinformation is a threat because they assume others are gullible
Altay, S., & Acerbi, A. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231153379 · Cited by 119
“For instance, they could divert our attention and resources from the real causes of the current information disorder (Wardle and Derakhshan, 2017), such as lack of trust in institutions and high partisan animosity (Osmundsen et al., 2021; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundAltay, S., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612221148981 · Cited by 83
“More broadly, low trust in news and institutions is strongly associated with holding misconceptions and false beliefs (Roozenbeek et al. 2020; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
BackgroundAnger can make fake news viral online
Chuai, Y., & Zhao, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.970174 · Cited by 54
Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., & Kaiser, J. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642221118264 · Cited by 82
“There is also some evidence that belief in fabricated news is linked with voting for right-wing populist parties (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Nisbet, E., Mortenson, C., & Li, Q. (2021) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-59 · Cited by 50
“Some studies show limited or no direct impact from misinformation, whilst others indicate significant impacts on political behavior (e.g., Bail et al., 2020; Gunther et al., 2019; Zimmerman & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundDamstra, A., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Lindgren, E., Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2021) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2021.1979423 · Cited by 48
“Similarly, German disinformation is found to contain mostly right-wing implications “ such as skepticism toward the European Union ( … ) and above all the exclusion of migrants and refugees ” (Zimmermann and Kohring 2020, 221).”
The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: analyzing patterns of resilience
Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Aelst, P. V., Staender, A., & Morosoli, S. (2021) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.2006744 · Cited by 92
“For example, Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) showed that low trust in news media increases belief in disinformation.”
BackgroundKaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac002 · Cited by 44
When Do Parties Lie? Misinformation and Radical-Right Populism Across 26 Countries
Törnberg, P., & Chueri, J. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241311886 · Cited by 74
“…suggest that the causal mechanism underlying this association is that the populists’ Manichean understanding of politics attracts voters who are particularly disenchanted with democracy and dis-trustful of mainstream institutions, especially mainstream media (Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
InfluentialSindermann, C., Schmitt, H., Rozgonjuk, D., Elhai, J. D., & Montag, C. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503 · Cited by 48
“Heliyon 7 (2021) e06503 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Heliyon journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon Research article The evaluation of fake and true news: on the role of intelligence, personality, interpersonal trust, ideological attitudes, and news consumption Cornelia Sindermann a,*, Helena Sophia Schmi…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWagnsson, C. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2022.2041700 · Cited by 41
“In a study on German voters, Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) found that media consumers with low trust in institutions and mainstream media tend to turn to alternative and nonreliable sources of information (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020, p. 227, 231).”
BackgroundPiltch-Loeb, R., Su, M., Hughes, B., Testa, M. A., Goldberg, B., Braddock, K., Miller-Idriss, C., Maturo, V., & Savoia, E. (2021) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/34615 · Cited by 41
“Research evaluating the utility of online fact checking suggests that even under less uncertain conditions, it remains an uneven but relatively effective counterstrategy to disinformation [22-26].”
BackgroundBelieving and Sharing Information by Fake Sources: An Experiment
Bauer, P. C., & von Hohenberg, B. C. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1840462 · Cited by 52
“This parallels other recent evidence that people low on media trust are more susceptible to disinformation (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundRight-wing authoritarianism, conspiracy mentality, and susceptibility to distorted alternative news
Frischlich, L., Hellmann, J. H., Brinkschulte, F., Becker, M., & Back, M. D. (2021) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2021.1966499 · Cited by 50
Kops, M., Schittenhelm, C., & Wachs, S. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108650 · Cited by 39
Who Believes in Fake News? Identification of Political (A)Symmetries
Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2022) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci11100460 · Cited by 53
“Other studies (such as Zimmermann and Kohring 2020; Hopp et al. 2020; Grinberg et al. 2019) collected data through user engagement on social media.”
BackgroundInfluentialAlternative Counter-News Use and Fake News Recall During the COVID-19 Crisis
Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259 · Cited by 38
“Such distrust can make people more susceptible to fake news (Frischlich and Humprecht 2021; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
BackgroundMethodThe Campaign Disinformation Divide: Believing and Sharing News in the 2019 UK General Election
Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & Kaiser, J. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2128948 · Cited by 35
“Building on, but also departing from, existing research (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017; Rossini et al., 2021; Valenzuela et al., 2019; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020), we found that citizens’ exposure to campaign coverage by professional news organizations was associated with their greater ability to…”
ResultHow Effective Are Interventions Against Misinformation?
Altay, S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sm3vk · Cited by 32
Humprecht, E. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2023.2200196 · Cited by 46
“Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) observed that in Germany, political trust decreases the likelihood of believing in disinformation, but disinformation does not affect political trust.”
Donetsk don’t tell – ‘hybrid war’ in Ukraine and the limits of social media influence operations
Maschmeyer, L., Abrahams, A., Pomerantsev, P., & Yermolenko, V. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2211969 · Cited by 56
“Emerging experimental evidence indicates some audience effects (Bauer & von Hohenberg, 2020; Min & Luqiu, 2021; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Who falls for fake news? Psychological and clinical profiling evidence of fake news consumers
Escolà‐Gascón, Á., Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K. G., & Bosch, M. D. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111893 · Cited by 34
Rodríguez-Pérez, C., Paniagua-Rojano, F., & Magallón-Rosa, R. (2021) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v9i1.3374 · Cited by 25
“As distrust of media outlets and politics prevails in Colombia, finding certain evidence that associates less trust in the news and politics with a higher probability of believing in online disinformation was initiated (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundTowards Understanding Perceptual Differences between Genuine and Face-Swapped Videos
Wöhler, L., Zembaty, M., Castillo, S., & Magnor, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445627 · Cited by 24
“One feld with enormous potential to be abused is politics, where face swaps are feared to increase mistrust in politicians and parties, which may drive voters towards more radical groups [18, 63, 73].”
BackgroundNoain-Sánchez, A. (2021) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/esmp.72874 · Cited by 40
Who Posts Fake News? Authentic and Inauthentic Spreaders of Fabricated News on Facebook and Twitter
Dourado, T. (2023) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2023.2176352 · Cited by 23
“In recent years, the scale spread and capillarity of fake news have been favouring the agenda and politicians of the radical right (Marwick and Lewis 2017; Pyrhönen and Bauvois 2020; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
BackgroundThe moral psychology of misinformation: Why we excuse dishonesty in a post-truth world
Effron, D. A., & Helgason, B. A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101375 · Cited by 41
“Pundits and scholars argue we have entered a “post-truth” era, surrounded by dishonest politicians and “fake news” that stymie public health efforts, provoke violence, and undermine democracy [1-7].”
BackgroundHameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2267700 · Cited by 33
“…factors that are found to strongly influence the rating of true and false information and the effects of mis-and disinformation more generally (e.g. Zimmermann and Kohring 2020): Media trust, measured with five items asking about whether media are fair in their covering unbiased, tell the whole…”
Perach, R., Joyner, L., Husbands, D., & Buchanan, T. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231192032 · Cited by 19
Serrano-Puche, J., Rodríguez-Salcedo, N., & Martínez-Costa, M.-D.-P. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.sep.18 · Cited by 18
“It’s us against them up there”: Spreading online disinformation as populist collective action
Wintterlin, F., Schatto‐Eckrodt, T., Frischlich, L., Boberg, S., Reer, F., & Quandt, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107784 · Cited by 27
A Bibliometric Analysis of Disinformation through Social Media
Akram, M., Nasar, A., & Arshad-Ayaz, A. (2022) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/12545 · Cited by 18
Trust, Democratic Resilience, and the Infodemic
Frischlich, L., & Humprecht, E. (2021) · doi:10.5167/uzh-202660 · Cited by 18
Marino, G., & Iannelli, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174161 · Cited by 26
“Only one of these four studies employs a longitudinal research design (Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020), focusing on the 2017 German election campaign, when – according to the authors of this study – disinformation in online media presented a specific ideological orientation, given its negative framing regarding immigran…”
Background(Digital) Campaigning in Dissonant Public Spheres
Koc-Michalska, K., Klinger, U., Bennett, L., & Römmele, A. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2173872 · Cited by 17
“All of this means that, as social media become engines of campaign communication, elections in many nations are increasingly burdened with problems of disinformation and voter mistrust that often benefit rightwing or illiberal parties (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundDoes fake news affect voting behaviour?
Cantarella, M., Fraccaroli, N., & Volpe, R. G. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104628 · Cited by 81
Wolff, L., & Taddicken, M. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221090194 · Cited by 23
“Furthermore, our findings on different online information search patterns revealed incomplete coping processes as a reason for persistent attitudinal changes and thus support demands for encouraging media competencies to counteract disinformation impacts (Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020a).”
BackgroundInfluentialRodríguez, L. T. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.nov.12 · Cited by 23
Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors
Kwek, A., Peh, L., Tan, J., & Lee, J. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01813-9 · Cited by 23
“Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) bridge the gap between distrust in news and belief in disinformation.”
BackgroundLee, T., Johnson, T. J., & Wilkerson, H. S. (2022) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2026401 · Cited by 16
“Some studies found consequential effects of fake news on citizens’ political behavior (Gunther et al., 2019; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020) whereas others demonstrated that exposure to fake news is much less than assumed and so is its real-world impact (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017; Grinberg et al., 2019;…”
BackgroundStubenvoll, M., & Matthes, J. (2021) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990211021800 · Cited by 26
“In the context of news consumption and misinformation, trust plays a vital role (see e.g., Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundSaldaña, M., Orchard, X., Rivera, S., & Bustamante-Pavez, G. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241298853 · Cited by 15
“Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) demonstrate that reduced levels of trust in the news media correlate with a heightened belief in disinformation in Germany.”
Social Media Effects on Public Trust in the European Union
Kiratli, O. (2023) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfad029 · Cited by 15
“The findings also converge on the negative impact of digital media on institutional and political trust (Pietsch and Martin 2011; Im et al. 2014; Sabatini and Sarracino 2019; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
BackgroundForeign Anti-Mainstream Propaganda and Democratic Publics
Mader, M., Marinov, N., & Schoen, H. (2022) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140211060277 · Cited by 15
“See Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) who argue that fake news, spread online prior to the German election, resulted in higher vote shares for the AfD.”
BackgroundHameleers, M., Harff, D., & Schmuck, D. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2023.2210616 · Cited by 19
“Moreover, our findings offer some support for the role of individual-level differences in susceptibility to disinformation (e.g., Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
InfluentialWaeterloos, C., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2023) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-023-00297-4 · Cited by 14
“Whereas, empirical research has found evidence for the existence of this nexus (Ariely 2015; Knudsen et al. 2021), there has been rather limited attention to the ways low trust in news media might affect citizens’ choices regarding their political participation (Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
Hameleers, M. (2022) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v10i3.5307 · Cited by 14
“As citizens with more pronounced levels of distrust are more likely to accept misinformation (e.g., Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020) and in line with findings that citizens with populist attitudes are more likely to distrust established informa‐ tion (e.g., Schulz et al., 2020), we expect that…”
BackgroundResultFolkvord, F., Snelting, F., Anschütz, D. J., Hartmann, T., Theben, A., Gunderson, L., Vermeulen, I., & Lupiáñez‐Villanueva, F. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/27945 · Cited by 15
“Since many people, particularly youth [3], consume their main news information from social media platforms, the influence of disinformation has become a real threat around the world and should be investigated [16-19].”
Navigating the Disinformation Maze: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Efforts
Tataru, G.-C., Domenteanu, A., Delcea, C., Florescu, M., Orzan, M., & Cotfas, L.-A. (2024) · Inf. · doi:10.3390/info15120742 · Cited by 13
‘Keeping an Eye on the Other Side’: RT, Sputnik, and Their Peculiar Appeal in Democratic Societies
Wagnsson, C., Blad, T., & Hoyle, A. (2023) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612221147492 · Cited by 13
“…alternative media, which demonstrates that individuals with low levels of trust in institutions and mainstream media are overrepresented among consumers of alternative or unreliable sources of information (Noppari et al. 2019; Thorbjørnsrud and Figenschou 2020; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
Conspiracism in Populist Radical Right Candidates: Rallying the Base or Mainstreaming the Fringe?
Sawyer, P. S. (2021) · International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-021-09398-4 · Cited by 13
Desinformación en contextos de polarización social: el paro nacional en Colombia del 21N
Pérez, C. V. R., Ortiz-Calderón, L. S., & Esquivel-Coronado, J. P. (2021) · Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación · doi:10.22395/angr.v19n38a7 · Cited by 13
Jahng, M. R., Stoycheff, E., & Rochadiat, A. M. P. (2021) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2020.1870143 · Cited by 18
“While “fake news” often suggests a strong political motivation (Bennett & Livingston, 2018; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020), health communication (Van der Meer & Jin, 2020) and science communication (Taddicken & Wolff, 2020) are not immune from fake news attacks.”
BackgroundKont, J., Elving, W. J. L., Broersma, M., & Bozdağ, Ç. (2024) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2023-0078 · Cited by 17
Beyond Credibility: The Effects of Different Forms of Visual Disinformation
Weikmann, T., Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2025) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990251357299 · Cited by 11
“Studies show that belief in disinformation can impact voting behavior by diminishing support for the governing party and swaying opinions toward right-wing populism (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Disinformation and Regime Survival
Sato, Y., Wiebrecht, F., & Lindberg, S. I. (2024) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241252811 · Cited by 24
“Unfortunately for democracy, being exposed to disinformation also has an impact on voting choices at least in some cases (Cantarella, Fraccaroli, and Volpe 2023; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
BackgroundDISINFORMATION’S SOCIETAL IMPACT: BRITAIN, COVID, AND BEYOND
Colley, T., Granelli, F., & Althuis, J. (2020) · Defence Strategic Communications · doi:10.30966/2018.riga.8.3 · Cited by 11
Santos, A. J. D. S., Cazzamatta, R., & Napolitano, C. J. (2025) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/17480485251348550 · Cited by 16
“…poses societal risks, including the potential to undermine democratic electoral processes (McKay and Tenove, 2021), fuel far-right support (Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020), intensify political polarisation (Vasist et al., 2024), and erode public trust in the media (Suiter and Fletcher,…”
Štětka, V., Brandao, F., Mihelj, S., Tóth, F., Hallin, D., Rothberg, D., Ferracioli, P., & Klimkiewicz, B. (2024) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2413121 · Cited by 10
“…repeatedly demonstrated that people with populist attitudes are more likely to believe misinformation (Hameleers, 2022) or hold conspiracy beliefs (Castanho Silva et al., 2017); similar associations were found among populist right-wing voters (Van Kessel et al., 2020; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Holtrup, S., Henke, J., Steffan, D., & Möhring, W. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990231202692 · Cited by 10
“Longitudinal studies have shown that the less citizens trust the news media, the more they believe in (online) disinformation (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundEffects of Repeated Corrections of Misinformation on Organizational Trust: More is Not Always Better
Denner, N., Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2022) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2022.2135098 · Cited by 22
“We decided to use a fictitious post on Facebook because misinformation is often spread via social media sites The prevalence of misinformation has increased as the growth of social media has made it easier for people to spread false information (Vosoughi et al., 2018; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundMethodMicrotargeted propaganda by foreign actors: An interdisciplinary exploration
Fathaigh, R. Ó., Dobber, T., Borgesius, F. Z., & Shires, J. (2021) · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.1177/1023263x211042471 · Cited by 10
Election integrity across Europe: who thinks elections are held fairly and why?
Goldberg, A. C., & Plescia, C. (2024) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773924000055 · Cited by 15
Crisis alert: (Dis)information selection and sharing in the COVID-19 pandemic
Klebba, L., & Winter, S. (2023) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2022-0020 · Cited by 15
Hameleers, M. (2022) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v10i4.5654 · Cited by 15
“Although most research has pointed to indirect effects of disinformation exposure (e.g., Schaewitz et al., 2020; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020) and a stronger dif‐ ference in perceived credibility across authentic infor‐ mation and disinformation (Hameleers et al., 2020), we found that right‐wing…”
BackgroundVegetti, F., & Mancosu, M. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642221118255 · Cited by 9
“Other studies have been looking at the consequences of pseudo-information for political opinions and behaviors, generally finding small effects, and concentrated in the short term (Flynn et al., 2017; Garrett, 2019; Weeks & Garrett, 2014; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Navigating the challenges of fake news and media trust: a bibliometric study
Dwivedi, V., & Sen, K. (2025) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-07-2024-0106 · Cited by 15
Oktavianus, J., & Meng, X. (2024) · Technology and Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102658 · Cited by 8
Investigating the Perception of Facial Anonymization Techniques in 360° Videos
Wöhler, L., Ikehata, S., & Aizawa, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/3695254 · Cited by 8
“To further understand the effect of immersive viewing experiences, additional experiments focusing on a broader range of stimuli including comparisons between regular and 360 ◦ videos would be beneficial.”
Understanding Which Factors Promote Exposure to Online Disinformation
Rodríguez-Pérez, C., & Garcia-Vargas, G. (2021) · Politics of Disinformation · doi:10.1002/9781119743347.ch13 · Cited by 8
Malhotra, A., Evans, N., Gao, J., Du, J. T., & Zheng, C. (2025) · J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. · doi:10.1002/asi.25016 · Cited by 7
Hameleers, M. (2023) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642231174334 · Cited by 7
“In addition, Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) show that lower levels of media trust correspond with susceptibility to online disinformation.”
Four Paths To Misperceptions: A Panel Study On Resistance Against Journalistic Evidence
Stubenvoll, M., & Matthes, J. (2021) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2021.1951767 · Cited by 7
Retroactive Gatekeepers: Fact-Checkers, Electoral Disinformation, and Audience Engagement in India
Roy, E., Laskar, K. A., & Reyaz, M. (2025) · Emerging Media · doi:10.1177/27523543251395190 · Cited by 6
“Democracies across the Global South and Global North alike have witnessed how misinfor-mation exploits social divisions and erodes trust in electoral processes (Baptista & Gradim, 2022; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Ahmed, S., Masood, M., Deng, R.-L., & Malviya, S. (2025) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2025.2538142 · Cited by 6
“…priming theory, political cynicism promotes belief in misinformation that aligns with their existing political stands and feelings characterized by distrust, criticism, and dissatisfaction towards public institutions, politicians, and political processes (Zahidi, 2024; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Wagnsson, C., Östervall, A., & Angwald, A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04844-6 · Cited by 6
“Trust is key to the functioning of democracy (Inglehart, 1988; Putnam, 1993) but can be undermined through the strategic spread of disinformation (Ross et al. 2022; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
Durach, F., Ciocea, M., & Nastasiu, C. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.9529 · Cited by 6
“The less one trusts news media and politics, the more one believes in online disinformation (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Fake News Detection Model with Hybrid Features—News Text, Image, and Social Context
Lin, S., Hu, Y., Lee, P.-J., Zeng, Y.-H., Chang, C.-M., & Chang, H.-C. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10589-z · Cited by 6
Christner, C., Makhortykh, M., & Gil‐López, T. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102250 · Cited by 5
Balcaen, P., Buts, C., du Bois, C., & Tkacheva, O. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101968 · Cited by 6
Wilson, T. D., & Macevičiūtė, E. (2022) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-05-2022-0116 · Cited by 11
Hughes, B., White, K., West, J., Criezis, M., Zhou, C. K., & Bartholomew, S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312624 · Cited by 7
Michael Polányi’s fiduciary program against fake news and deepfake in the digital age
Ziegler, Z. (2021) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01217-w · Cited by 6
Martire, K. A., Growns, B., Bali, A. S., Montgomery-Farrer, B., Summersby, S., & Younan, M. (2020) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00264-z · Cited by 17
Rethinking the problem of misinformation and its solutions
Altay, S. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261428635 · Cited by 8
Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2025) · Nordicom Review · doi:10.2478/nor-2025-0006 · Cited by 5
“…correct, factual, or unbiased information, or based on a feeling of vulnerability, anger, resentment, or that the media is untrustworthy (Andersen et al., 2023; Ihlebæk & Holter, 2021; Jakobsson & Stiernstedt, 2024; Suiter & Fletcher, 2020; Yamamoto et al., 2022; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmermann, Fabian
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-237
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W2997867760
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 41.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Political Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- disinformation, public trust in government, vote choice, 2017 German federal election, Alternative für Deutschland, right-wing populism, CDU/CSU, online news, political campaigns, political alienation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review