The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we address the question of whether disinforming news spread online possesses the power to change the prevailing political circumstances during an election campaign. We highlight factors for believing disinformation that until now have received little attention, namely trust in news media and trust in politics. A panel survey in the context of the 2017 German parliamentary election (N = 989) shows that believing disinforming news had a specific impact on vote choice by alienating voters from the main governing party (i.e., the CDU/CSU), and driving them into the arms of right-wing populists (i.e., the AfD). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the less one trusts in news media and politics, the more one believes in online disinformation. Hence, we provide empirical evidence for Bennett and Livingston’s notion of a disinformation order, which forms in opposition to the established information system to disrupt democracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, detrimental associations were found for trust in governments and politics59,60,66,78–82, trust in media83, and social and institutional trust84.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
In the citing paper
“In a panel survey in Germany, a decline in trust that accompanied increasing digital media consumption was also linked to a turn towards the hard-right populist AfD party80.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314 · cited 1×
“Discriminant validity concerning the different factors was also tested and confirmed based on the Fornell-Larcker criterion (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).”
MethodThe case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · cited 1×
“Interestingly, there is evidence that individuals are more likely to engage in the latter (Kunda, 1990).”
BackgroundExit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States
Schwartz, L. B., & Hirschman, A. (1972) · doi:10.2307/3311348 · Cited by 9,022 · cited 1×
“And third, they could exit the party system entirely through abstention from the vote (Hirschman, 1970; Hooghe, Marien, & Pauwels, 2011).”
BackgroundSocial Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767 · cited 6×
“These placebo news items were meant to control for a possible inflation of the disnews scores in the upcoming analysis (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017, p. 220).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160 · cited 1×
“…from other forms of disinformation (e.g., conspiracy theories) by its distinct news character: By applying news values such as unexpectedness and negativity as well as news formats, disnews purports to hold journalistic credibility (Lazer et al., 2018; Levy, 2017; Tandoc, Lim,&Ling, 2018a, p. 143).”
BackgroundCole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558 · Cited by 3,605 · cited 1×
“In order to benefit from the panel design of our study, we conceptualized it as a so-called autoregressive model with cross-lagged effects (Cole & Maxwell, 2003; Finkel, 1995; Jöreskog, 1979).”
MethodA re-assessment of the concept of political support.
Easton, D. (1975) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400008309 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 2×
“In general, trust in politics refers to “the probability … that the political system (or some part of it) will produce preferred outcomes even if left untended” (Gamson, 1968, p. 54; Easton, 1975, p. 447).”
BackgroundTandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 · Cited by 2,745 · cited 1×
“Especially in the online context, media literacy facilitates authentication of true and rejection of false news (Tandoc et al., 2018b).”
BackgroundFrankel, S. H., Simmel, G., Bottomore, T., & Frisby, D. (1979) · doi:10.2307/2231435 · Cited by 2,453 · cited 1×
“Thus, to trust means that an actor delegates responsibility for a certain action to another actor, though they know that this actor potentially could not meet their expectation (Barber, 1983; Simmel, 2004, pp. 173–181).”
BackgroundStructural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
Byrne, B. M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203807644 · Cited by 2,063
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Ernst N., 2017, International Journal of Communication, 11, 3265
- 10.4135/9781412983594 · DOI
- Gibson T. A., 2018, International Journal of Communication, 12, 3167
- Guess A., 2018, Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign
- Jöreskog K. G., 1979, Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models, 129
- Kline R. B., 2016, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
- Levy N., 2017, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 6, 20
- Luhmann N., 1979, Trust and power
- McFadden D., 1974, Frontiers in econometrics, 105
- Muthén L. K., 2015, Mplus user’s guide
- Pennycook G., 2017, Social Science Research Network
- 10.5964/ejop.v8i2.456 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203481134 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2012 · DOI
- Weedon J., 2017, Information operations and Facebook
- 10.1111/jcom.1224 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–178 of 178
Disinformation Dynamics and Regulation in Portugal: Insights from a Qualitative Study
Guedes, I., Vigo, B., Santos, M. A., Moreira, S., Cardoso, C. S., & Castro, J. (2025) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-025-09617-0 · Cited by 5
Mendoza, G., Ballar, K. J., Yap, J. K., & Deinla, I. B. (2023) · Media Asia · doi:10.1080/01296612.2023.2279343 · Cited by 5
“Yet most seem to only focus on the impact of misinformation 2 on vote choice (Cantarella et al., 2020; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
BackgroundElectoral Crisis Communications: Combatting Disinformation & the Contest for Electoral Legitimacy
Winger, G. H., Calfano, B., Vićić, J., & Harknett, R. J. (2023) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x231184440 · Cited by 5
Sportelli, C., & D’Errico, F. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15050695 · Cited by 6
Hameleers, M. (2025) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2024-0060 · Cited by 4
“As these citizens are also least resilient to disinforma-tion (e.g., Humprecht et al., 2020; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020), interventions may aim to instill more resilience among distrusting audience segments.”
Prike, T., Baker, J. R., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13059 · Cited by 4
“Political misinformation is also caustic because it can potentially influence voters (Gunther et al., 2019; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020; although see Leyva & Beckett, 2020), under-mining their ability to make well-informed and evidence-based decisions.”
Explaining Russian state-sponsored disinformation campaigns: who is targeted and why?
Stewart, B. M., Jackson, S., Ishiyama, J., & Marshall, M. C. (2024) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2024.2302597 · Cited by 4
“This worsens debates over public policy (Kuklinski et al. 2000) and hampers citizens ’ ability to choose elected o ffi cials (Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
Examining Journalist’s Perception of Fake News and Their Attitude toward Debunking disinformation
Çela, E. (2023) · Studies in Media and Communication · doi:10.11114/smc.v11i6.6307 · Cited by 4
Russo, R., & Blikstein, P. (2023) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-10-2022-0118 · Cited by 4
When Politics Disgust: Emotional versus Rational Processing of Attack Ads
Passyn, K. A., LeBaron, D., & Riggle, R. J. (2022) · Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing · doi:10.1080/10495142.2022.2133062 · Cited by 4
“Of concern, a recent study by Fabian, Zimmermann and Kohring (2019) find that as trust in politics decreases, individuals become more likely to believe in online political disinformation.”
BackgroundGrabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2022) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2022.2120482 · Cited by 6
Aktuelle Desinformation – Definition und Einordnung einer gesellschaftlichen Herausforderung
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020) · Fake News und Desinformation · doi:10.5771/9783748901334-21 · Cited by 4
Self-citationHameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251409208 · Cited by 3
A fact-checking tool based on Artificial Intelligence to fight disinformation on Telegram
Cantón-Correa, F.-J., Ballesteros-Aguayo, L., & Montoro-Montarroso, A. (2025) · Communication & Society · doi:10.15581/003.38.1.019 · Cited by 3
“The result is, according to Zimmermann and Kohring (2020), a disinformation order that forms in opposition to the established information system to disrupt democracy.”
How effective are fact-checks in Pakistan and who engages with them?
Ejaz, W., Altay, S., & Ittefaq, M. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2445636 · Cited by 7
“…they also function as conduits, facilitating the accelerated dissemination of misinformation, particularly in the wake of significant global events such as the US Presidential election, Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war (Altay et al., 2022; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Pimenta, R., Regly, T., Silva, A. K. S., & Belfort, H. (2024) · Encontros Bibli · doi:10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e100310 · Cited by 3
Trust in News and Trust through News
Verbalyte, M., Trenz, H., & Eigmüller, M. (2023) · Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1163/15691330-bja10096 · Cited by 3
Christner, C. (2023) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2022-0024 · Cited by 4
Mis- and Disinformation during the 2021 Canadian Federal Election
Bridgman, A., Lavigne, M., Baker, M., Bergeron, T., Bohonos, D., Burton, A., McCoy, K., Hart, M. B., Hiltz, R., Lavault, M.-N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.66536/federal-election-misinfo_2022 · Cited by 3
A Political Science Perspective on Fake News
MacCarthaigh, M., & McKeown, C. (2020) · Data Science for Fake News · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62696-9_11 · Cited by 3
Political Fact-Checking Efforts are Constrained by Deficiencies in Coverage, Speed, and Reach
Wack, M., Duskin, K., & Hodel, D. (2026) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2026.2704896 · Cited by 15
Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Tulin, M., & Dobber, T. (2026) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502261421437 · Cited by 7
Hameleers, M. (2025) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2025.2458862 · Cited by 2
“In line with this, extant research found that distrusting citizens are most likely to accept political disinformation narratives (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
InfluentialFenoll, V., Gamir-Ríos, J., & Alonso-del-Barrio, E. (2024) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/emp.96629 · Cited by 2
Dynamic immunization for disinformation spreading on signed social networks
Li, A.-W., Liu, Y., Zhou, J., Zeng, A., Xu, X.-K., & Fan, Y. (2024) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2024.130321 · Cited by 2
Missau, L. D. (2024) · Tripodos · doi:10.51698/tripodos.2024.56.01 · Cited by 2
“Equally relevant, other works also report the effects of misinformation on the political and media systems of different countries (Vaccari and Chadwick, 2020; Duyn and Collier, 2019; Vargo et al ., 2018; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
Truth, Lies, and Social Ties: When Image Concerns Fuel Fake News
Sisak, D., & Denter, P. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.19557 · Cited by 2
Rodríguez-Pérez, C., Verdú, F. J. M., & Ruiz, M. J. U. (2024) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-02-2024-0094 · Cited by 4
Measuring the effectiveness of counter-disinformation strategies in the Czech security forces
Matejova, M., Drmola, J., & Spáč, P. (2024) · European Security · doi:10.1080/09662839.2024.2362153 · Cited by 10
“2019, Wilson and Wiysonge 2020, Zimmermann and Kohring 2020, Lewandowsky 2021).”
Public expectations towards the roles of the Indonesian house of representatives
Hidayaturrahman, M., Purwanto, E., Sinaga, A., Ubaid, A., Wardhani, W., & Sugiantiningsih, A. (2024) · Jurnal studi komunikasi · doi:10.25139/jsk.v8i1.7432 · Cited by 2
Media coverage of DeepFake disinformation: An analysis of three South-Asian countries
Sunvy, A. S., Reza, R. B., & Al-Imran, A. (2024) · Informasi · doi:10.21831/informasi.v53i2.66479 · Cited by 2
“According to the findings of Zimmermann and Kohring (2020), those who exhibit lower levels of trust in news media are more susceptible to being influenced by disinformation, thereby impacting their voting choices.”
BackgroundActual and Perceived Partisan Bias in Judgments of Political Misinformation as Lies
Reins, L. M., & Wiegmann, A. (2024) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231220702 · Cited by 2
“…the spread of misinformation has become a major threat to democratic societies: It can prevent fact-based debates, lead to public opinions being manipulated, and foster polarization and conflict among political groups (e.g., Cook et al., 2017; Loomba et al., 2021; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Disrupting democracy: how informational pathways and misinformation shape trust in election results
Rossini, P. G. C., Mont'Alverne, C., & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2026) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2026.2701896 · Cited by 1
“Conversely, citizens with low trust in mainstream media are more likely to believe in electoral disinformation (Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
Hermans, B., Waeterloos, C., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2026) · Online information review (Print) · doi:10.1108/oir-10-2025-0841 · Cited by 1
Grömping, M., Liddy-Corlett, T., & Carson, A. (2026) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2026.2631703 · Cited by 1
Mateus, J.-C., Etesse, M., Vásquez-Cubas, D., Monard, E., & Cappello, G. (2026) · International Journal of Communications · doi:10.65476/znt4bq22 · Cited by 1
“While distrust in media may foster an initial critical attitude, it may also drive individuals to seek alternative sources that are not necessarily reliable, thereby increasing their vulnerability to misinformation (Swart & Broersma, 2022; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
InfluentialBertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1718881 · Cited by 1
Franckx, L. W., & Zarouali, B. (2025) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2025.2585901 · Cited by 1
“We study this relationship through the mediating mechanisms of trust in democracy and trust in media—two concepts that are inherently part of HMP (Tsfati & Cohen, 2005, 2012), as well as disinformation processing (Hameleers, Brosius, & De Vreese, 2022; Humprecht, 2023; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
InfluentialGarcia-Ojeda, E., & Saavedra-Llamas, M. (2025) · Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social "Disertaciones" · doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/disertaciones/a.14885 · Cited by 1
Analyzing Viewer Perception of Generative AI-Based Editing in 360° Images Across Display Modalities
Wöhler, L., Son, T., Ikehata, S., & Aizawa, K. (2025) · CHI Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719819 · Cited by 1
Mainstream News Media Trust, Countermedia Attendance, and Political Learning
Hopp, T., Ferrucci, P., Vargo, C. J., & Mays, B. (2025) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990251329044 · Cited by 1
Ricard, J., Yañez, I., & Hora, L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.12537 · Cited by 1
Reach and dissemination channels of (selected) disinformation narratives in Serbia
Gruhonjić, D., Janjić, S., & Kleut, J. (2024) · Političke perspektive · doi:10.20901/pp.14.2.02 · Cited by 1
“…heard by more than half of the respondents, and with even the least heard narrative reaching a third of the survey population, Serbian data place it ahead of other countries such as Spain, U.S., Germany (Suau and Puertas-Graell, 2023; Silverman & Singer-Vine 2016; Zimmermann and Kohring 2020).”
Torres, M. F. M., Arroyo, A. M. Z., & Rodríguez, L. T. (2024) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/emp.96323 · Cited by 1
Reiter, F., & Matthes, J. (2024) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642241240335 · Cited by 1
Modern Techniques for fake news detection in Social Media
Ganachari, V., & Gurav, R. S. (2024) · South India Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.62656/sijss.v22i1.89 · Cited by 1
“Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020, states that Fake News is unwanted because it impacts and influence people psychologically and socially as it distorts and skew their belief which results in getting drowned into misinformation and wrong decisions.”
Yu, Y., Yan, S., Zhang, Q., Zhenzhen, X., Zhou, G., & Jin, H. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14040278 · Cited by 2
“Concerning individual differences, previous research found that differences in personal traits may affect news belief, such as personality [8–12], thinking style [4,13–15], media literacy [16–18], and prior attitudes [19–22].”
ResultTerrorism-Related Topic In The Language Of Fake News In Indonesia
Ahmet Yiğitalp Tulga, T. D. E. (2022) · Jurnal Mandala Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional · doi:10.33822/mjihi.v5i2.4935 · Cited by 1
A Proposed Method for Predicting User Disinformation Forwarding Behavior
Fang, B., Zhang, F., Hou, L., Hu, E., Zhang, J., Shen, J., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Scientific Programming · doi:10.1155/2022/9216063
“(3) People’s beliefs: Zimmermann and Kohring indicated that the less people trusted news media and politics, the more they trusted online disinformation [29].”
BackgroundA discrete choice model of voters’ decision in the general election 2019 using LASSO regression
Irvani, D., Notodiputro, K., & Sartono, B. (2021) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1115/1/012061 · Cited by 1
“The standard error of each coefficient is estimated using bootstrap method with 1000 replications [2], [7].”
MethodResultThe Prevalence and Impact of Political Disinformation During Elections in North Macedonia
Palloshi-Disha, E., Sorrells, J., Kreci, V., & Ismaili, V. (2025) · Media Literacy and Academic Research · doi:10.34135/mlar-25-01-11 · Cited by 1
Fake news e as eleições democráticas: uma revisão de escopo da literatura
Grizenti, E., Barros, S., & Resende, R. (2025) · Revista de Sociologia e Política · doi:10.1590/1678-98732433e005 · Cited by 1
Disinformation and Episodes of Regime TransformationPreprint
Sato, Y., Wiebrecht, F., Lindberg, S. I., & V-Dem Institute (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4569010 · Cited by 1
“Through false stories targeting competitors (e.g., Tenove, 2020; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020; Pirro and Taggart, 2022), anti-pluralists attempt to boost their own popularity or avoid blame in government (e.g., Pirro and Taggart, 2022).”
BackgroundPopulism and conspiracy theories: A cross-national analysis
Sawyer, P. S. (2026) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2026.103173
Ardèvol‐Abreu, A., López-Carrión, A. E., & Sánchez, J. D. P. G. (2026) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990261498350
Manipulating Truth: Disinformation Campaigns Against Child Protection Services in Europe
Corsulic, S. (2026) · ZRex – Zeitschrift für Rechtsextremismusforschung · doi:10.3224/zrex.v6i2.06
Developing and validating the information credibility assessment scale: a mixed-method approach
Ou, M.-X., & Ho, S. S. (2026) · Online information review (Print) · doi:10.1108/oir-12-2025-1097
Sombatpoonsiri, J., Bradshaw, S., & Mishra, K. (2026) · Asian Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/aspp.70116
Disinformation, Ideology, and Public Opinion in Central Europe
Hlatky, R. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009616935
Diverging associations of traditional versus social media with government trust
Borukhson, D., Fegert, J., & Lorenz-Spreen, P. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-08323-4
“The erosion of trust in institutions is associated with protest voting, support of extreme right-wing and populist parties (Hooghe et al., 2011), believing disin-formation (Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020) and even tolerance for unlawful behavior (Marien and Hooghe, 2011).”
Intégration de l'intelligence artificielle dans les parlements francophones
Oxéus, G., Gagnon, S., & Fitsilis, F. (2026) · Parliaments, Estates & Representation · doi:10.1080/02606755.2026.2684191
Hawkins, I., Mede, N., & Chinn, S. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07147-6
“Existing research has investigated similar connections in countries across Europe (Chadwick et al., 2018; Chadwick et al., 2021; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
Masullo, G. M., & Yao, S.-T. (2026) · News Research Journal · doi:10.1177/30497841261440467
“This is concerning because it can result in a less-informed electorate that is more susceptible to believing false information (Damstra et al., 2023; Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020) and less likely to participate politically (Valeriani & Vaccari, 2016).”
Youth in the Digital Environment: Building Trust to Foster Citizen Capacities
Volkova, A. V., & Kalashnikova, E. (2026) · 2026 Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS) · doi:10.1109/comsds69583.2026.11493810
“At the same time, the broader cultural context within which young individuals are embedded exerts a significant influence on how information is interpreted, assessed, and integrated into their cognitive frameworks [17, 18, 19].”
Guan, T.-R., Yang, Y., & Chen, X. (2026) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.70133
“Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) have suggested that disinformation may be aimed more at economic profit than persuasion.”
Lenk, T. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06656-8
“Moreover, Germany was expected to be one of the prime targets of Russian information manipulation according to political observers (Trellevik and Cie ś la, 2024).”
InfluentialGehle, L., Schemer, C., Tulin, M., & Hameleers, M. (2026) · International Journal of Communications · doi:10.65476/9fwxp210
“To account for this response bias, belief in true statements has been used as a control measure (Zimmermann & Kohring, 2020).”
Assessment of Trust and Satisfaction With Governmental Measures During Health Crises
Wolgast, A., Bruns, K. E., & Reinhaus, D. (2026) · Psychological Test Adaptation and Development · doi:10.1027/2698-1866/a000115
Sosyal Medyada Ekonomik Haberlerde Dezenformasyon: Nedenleri, Etkileri ve Mücadele Stratejileri
Koçarslan, H., Kılınç, E., Gedik, A., & Soylu, S. (2025) · Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.33461/uybisbbd.1822544
Disinformation in Crisis Contexts—Perception of Russia Today’s Narratives in Ecuador
Suing, A. (2025) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia6040192
Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H., Strömbäck, J., & Tsfati, Y. (2025) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849251350374
“Third, intentionally deceptive content often covers issues that mirror the agenda of the conservative and far-right community, such as crime and immigration (Pierri et al., 2020; Zimmermann and Kohring, 2020).”
Stubenvoll, M., Freiling, I., & Matthes, J. (2025) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2025.2501612
“…diverse statements that contradicted the best available evidence at the time, circulated on social media, and were addressed by fact-checkers (Zimmermann and Kohring 2020): “The Medical university of Vienna has concluded that the pain medication ibuprofen exacerbates symptoms caused by the…”
InfluentialZou, M.-L., & Ouyang, J. (2022) · Other Conferences · doi:10.1117/12.2646425
“A semi-structured interview outline was prepared based on the studies in the literature 5,6,7,8 , and 10 experts in network information management, 4 practitioners in network information management, and 6 graduate students in Library and Information Science were invited to discuss the influence…”
MethodHameleers, M., Brosius, A., & Vreese, C. D. D. (2022) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/02673231211072667
“In addition to that, Zimmermann and Kohring (2020) show that those who trust the media less are also more likely to believe online disinformation.”
Cea, N., & Palomo, B. (2021) · Politics of Disinformation · doi:10.1002/9781119743347.ch1
Salomi, V. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102136
Achieving Transparency, Reproducibility, and Readability with Hard-Coded Data: A ReviewPreprint
Edgell, A. B., Lachapelle, J., & Maerz, S. F. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4569520
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmermann, Fabian
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-237
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W2997867760
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 41.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Political Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- disinformation, public trust in government, vote choice, 2017 German federal election, Alternative für Deutschland, right-wing populism, CDU/CSU, online news, political campaigns, political alienation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review