The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Digestive Tract Cancers: A Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Cancers of the colon are most common in the Western world. In majority of these cases, there is no familial history and sporadic gene damage seems to play an important role in the development of tumors in the colon. Studies have shown that environmental factors, especially diet, play an important role in susceptibility to gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. Consequently, environmental chemicals that contaminate food or diet during preparation become important in the development of GI cancers. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are one such family of ubiquitous environmental toxicants. These pollutants enter the human body through consumption of contaminated food, drinking water, inhalation of cigarette smoke, automobile exhausts, and contaminated air from occupational settings. Among these pathways, dietary intake of PAHs constitutes a major source of exposure in humans. Although many reviews and books on PAHs and their ability to cause toxicity and breast or lung cancer have been published, aspects on contribution of diet, smoking and other factors toward development of digestive tract cancers, and strategies to assess risk from exposure to PAHs have received much less attention. This review, therefore, focuses on dietary intake of PAHs in humans, animal models, and cell cultures used for GI cancer studies along with epidemiological findings. Bioavailability and biotransformation processes, which influence the disposition of PAHs in body and the underlying causative mechanisms of GI cancers, are also discussed. The existing data gaps and scope for future studies is also emphasized. This information is expected to stimulate research on mechanisms of sporadic GI cancers caused by exposure to environmental carcinogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer
Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1 · Cited by 4,919
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex
Hankinson, O. (1995) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.001515 · Cited by 1,649
Maanen, J. M. S. V., Moonen, E. J. C., Maas, L. M., Kleinjans, J. C. S., & Schooten, F. J. V. (1994) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/15.10.2263 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Akhbarizadeh, R., Dobaradaran, S., Amouei Torkmahalleh, M., Saeedi, R., Aibaghi, R., & Faraji Ghasemi, F. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110339 · Cited by 465
Liquid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review
Jalili, V., Barkhordari, A., & Ghiasvand, A. (2020) · Reviews in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1515/revac-2020-0101 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Diggs, D. L., Huderson, A. C., Harris, K. L., Myers, J. N., Banks, L. D., Rekhadevi, P. V., Niaz, M. S., & Ramesh, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 324-357
- ISSN
- 1059-0501 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2025201946
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.