The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Biosynthesis of Cellulose
Abstract
Cellulose is one of the major commercial products of Sweden and constitutes the most abundant of the natural polymer systems. Thus, it is of interest to review the molecular design and architecture of cellulose with particular reference to the controls of its biosynthesis. The bioassembly process is highly ordered and structured, reflecting the intricate series of events which must occur to generate a thermodynamically metastable crystalline submicroscopic, ribbonlike structure. The plant cell wall is an extremely complex composite of many different polymers. Cellulose is the “reinforcing rod” component of the wall. True architectural design demands a polymer which can withstand great flexing and torsional strain. Using comparative Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis of a bacterial cellulose synthase and other glycosyl transferases, the multidomain architecture of glycosyl transferases has been analyzed. All polymerization reactions which are processive require at least three catalytic sites located on two different domains. In contrast, retaining reactions with glycosyl transferases require only a single domain and two sites. Cellulose synthase appears to have evolved a mechanism to simultaneously bind at least three UDP-glucoses and to polymerize, by double addition, two UDP-glucoses in such a manner that the 2-fold screw axis of the β-1,4-glucan chain is maintained. Thus, no primer is required as the glucose monomers are added two-by-two to the growing chain. At the next higher level of assembly, the catalytic sites simultaneously polymerize parallel glucan chain polymers in close proximity so that they will favorably associate to crystallize into the metastable cellulose I allomorph. Recent energy analysis suggests that the first stage of this association is the formation of a minisheet through van der Waals forces, followed by layering of these minisheets to form the crystalline microfibril. In native cellulose biogenesis, the microfibril shape and size appear to be determined by a multimeric enzyme complex (TC) which resides in the plasma membrane. This complex, known as a terminal complex, was discovered through electron microscopy of freeze fracture replicas. The entire complex moves in the plane of the fluid plasma membrane as the result of polymerization/crystallization reactions. The assembly stages for native cellulose I are coordinated on a spatial/temporal scale, and they are under the genetic control of the organism. This might lead one to conclude that cellulose I could only be assembled with Nature's indigenous machinery; however, this is not the case. Recently, in collaboration with Professor Kobayashi and his colleagues in Sendai and Tokyo, we have synthesized cellulose I abiotically under conditions very different from those in the living cell or from isolated cell components. Purification of an endoglucanase from Trichoderma which serves as the catalyst and the addition of β-cellobiosyl fluoride as the substrate in acetonitrile/acetate buffer has led to the assembly of synthetic cellulose I. Although natural and synthetic assembly pathways are very different, there are similar, underlying fundamental mechanisms common to both. These mechanisms will be discussed in relation to the more thermodynamically stable allomorph of cellulose (cellulose II) first demonstrated by Professor Rånby in 1952. The evolution of cellulose biosynthesis will be summarized in terms of the demands for maintaining optimal cellular environments to generate the complex macromolecular assemblies for cell wall biogenesis. Nature provides an exceptional model for cellulose biosynthesis that will lead us toward the biotechnological production of improved natural cellulose as well as synthetic cellulose and its derivatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sugiyama, J., Vuong, R., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00014a033 · Cited by 791
Combined infrared and electron diffraction study of the polymorphism of native celluloses
Sugiyama, J., Persson, J., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00009a050 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material
Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H., & Bohn, A. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200460587 · Cited by 7,551
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Polylactide (PLA)-based nanocomposites
Raquez, J.-M., Habibi, Y., Murariu, M., & Dubois, P. (2013) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 · Cited by 1,209
Kimura, S., Laosinchai, W., Itoh, T., Cui, X., Linder, C. R., & Brown, R. M. (1999) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.11.11.2075 · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1345-1373
- ISSN
- 1060-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5738
- OpenAlex
- W1984235867
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Biosynthesis of Cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10601329608014912
- The paper
- Brown, R. M. (1996). The Biosynthesis of Cellulose. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601329608014912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.