Cited by 83Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Psychological factors predicting stress symptoms: Metacognition, thought control, and varieties of worry

Roussis, Panagiotis, Wells, Adrian·2008·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

This study tested predictions of the metacognitive model of post-traumatic stress disorder (Wells, 2000) concerning relationships between stress symptoms and maladaptive control of thoughts. We tested the hypothesis that the tendency to use worry as a means of controlling thoughts will be positively predictive of stress symptoms. In doing so, overlaps with symptomatic worry, stress symptoms, and stress exposure at time 1 was controlled. One hundred and ten (110) college students were assessed twice, over a three-month period. Consistent with predictions, use of worry as a thought control strategy made a significant and independent contribution to the prediction of stress symptoms. The findings provide further support for Wells' metacognitive model of stress reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615800801889600

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual differences in the use of worry to regulate distressing thoughts is a prospective predictor of stress symptoms in college students following exposure to life events.

    “In line with these findings, individual differences in the use of worry to regulate distressing thoughts is a prospective predictor of stress symptoms in college students following exposure to life events (Roussis & Wells, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roussis, P., & Wells, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Manchester
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2008-07
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
213-225
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2073787520
Cited by
83
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metacognition, thought control, worry, stress symptoms, stress exposure, university students
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychological Theory, Regression Analysis, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review