Gender role stress and burnout in chinese human service professionals in Hong Kong
Abstract
Three hundred and seventy-four Chinese human service professionals were surveyed to examine the associations between burnout and gender role stress. Gender role stress refers to people's gender-based cognitive appraisal of specific situations that are role dystonic and stressful. Results showed that gender role stress was the best predictor for emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, while professional type was the best predictor for personal accomplishment. Masculine gender role stress was related to emotional exhaustion and depersonalization for both male and female professionals, whereas feminine gender role stress was related to similar burnout dimensions for male professionals only. Gender role stress and burnout associations were found only in gender-typed professions of police officers and nurses, but not in a nongender-typed profession of secondary school teacher. Among the three groups, nurses experienced a higher level of gender role stress and lack of personal accomplishment than police officers and teachers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gender role stress is associated with decreased personal accomplishment in women police officers.
“Gender role stress (characterized by a gender-based cognitive appraisal of specific situations) was associated with increased exhaustion and depersonalisation in men, and decreased personal accomplishment in women (Tang and Lau, 1996).”
From Psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with burnout in police officers: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as Tang and Lau, 1996
Gender role stress is associated with increased exhaustion and depersonalisation in men police officers.
“Gender role stress (characterized by a gender-based cognitive appraisal of specific situations) was associated with increased exhaustion and depersonalisation in men, and decreased personal accomplishment in women (Tang and Lau, 1996).”
From Psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with burnout in police officers: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as Tang and Lau, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burnout syndrome in secondary school teachers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
García-Carmona, M., Marín, M. D., & Aguayo, R. (2019) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9471-9 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Alves, L., Abreo, L., Petkari, E., & Pinto da Costa, M. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.081 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tang, C. S.-K., & Lau, B. H.-B.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- Anxiety, Stress & Coping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-227
- ISSN
- 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2205
- OpenAlex
- W2141285980
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Keywords
- gender role stress, burnout, human service workers, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, masculine gender role stress, nurses, police officers, secondary school teachers, Chinese professionals, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review