The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective
Abstract
The present author was asked to provide an update on the status and the more recent developments around the shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model for this special issue of the journal. The article is therefore not intended as a comprehensive overview of the status of engineering turbulence modelling in general, nor on the overall turbulence modelling strategy for ANSYS computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in particular. It is clear from many decades of turbulence modelling that no single model – nor even a single modelling approach – can solve all engineering flows. Any successful CFD code will therefore have to offer a wide range of models from simple Eddy-viscosity models through second moment closures all the way to the variety of unsteady modelling concepts currently under development. This article is solely intended to outline the role of the concepts behind the SST model in current and future CFD simulations of engineering flows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
Menter, F. R. (1994) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.12149 · Cited by 21,593
Self-citation
Cited by
Establishing a fully coupled CFD analysis tool for floating offshore wind turbines
Liu, Y., Xiao, Q., Incecik, A., Peyrard, C., & Wan, D. (2017) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.052 · Cited by 319
Fluid dynamics in a bubble column: New experiments and simulations
Rzehak, R., Krauß, M., Kováts, P., & Zähringer, K. (2017) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.09.024 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Menter, F. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 305-316
- ISSN
- 1026-7417 (ISSN-L)
- 1061-8562
- 1029-0257
- OpenAlex
- W1982982665
- Cited by
- 1,053
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10618560902773387
- The paper
- Menter, F. R. (2009). Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560902773387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
