The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Effectiveness of a Measurement Error Tutorial in Helping Teachers Understand Score Report Results
Abstract
The goal of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a short web-based tutorial in helping teachers to better understand the portrayal of measurement error in test score reports. The short video tutorial included both verbal and graphical representations of measurement error. Results showed a significant difference in comprehension scores between each of two tutorial groups (basic and enhanced) and the control group (no tutorial) but not between the two tutorial groups. Results also provided evidence of teachers' misconceptions about the meaning of measurement error and confidence bands.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Zapata-Rivera et al. (2016) showed that a brief online tutorial for teachers containing causes, definitions, illustrations, and interoperations of measurement error can improve teachers’ understanding of the method and practice.”
From Visualizing Uncertainty to Promote Clinicians’ Understanding of Measurement Error (2023) · cites this paper as Zapata-Rivera et al. (2016)
Citations
Cites
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
The standards for educational and psychological testing.
Eignor, D. R. (2013) · APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. · doi:10.1037/14047-013 · Cited by 6,988
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n432 · Cited by 3,126
Mayer, R. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164603 · Cited by 2,304
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1902_02 · Cited by 912
Journal of Statistics Education
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n236 · Cited by 348
Error Bars Considered Harmful: Exploring Alternate Encodings for Mean and Error
Correll, M., & Gleicher, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346298 · Cited by 258
Bennett, R. E., & Gitomer, D. H. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9_3 · Cited by 175
Goodman, D. P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2004) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1702_3 · Cited by 126
Facilitating the Development of Assessment Literacy
Lukin, L. E., Bandalos, D. L., Eckhout, T. J., & Mickelson, K. (2004) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00156.x · Cited by 88
Developing Test Score Reports That Work: The Process and Best Practices for Effective Communication
Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K. (2012) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00231.x · Cited by 62
Inference by Eye: Pictures of Confidence Intervals and Thinking About Levels of Confidence
Cumming, G. (2007) · Teaching Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9639.2007.00267.x · Cited by 62
Alternative Displays for Communicating NAEP Results: A Redesign and Validity Study
Wainer, H., Hambleton, R. K., & Meara, K. (1999) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00559.x · Cited by 49
Are NAEP Executive Summary Reports Understandable to Policy Makers and Educators
Hambleton, R. K., & Slater, S. C. (1996) · Cited by 46
Keeping your audience in mind: applying audience analysis to the design of interactive score reports
Zapata-Rivera, J. D., & Katz, I. R. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.936357 · Cited by 46
Does Interpretive Test Score Information Help Teachers?
Impara, J. C., Divine, K. P., Bruce, F. A., Liverman, M. R., & Gay, A. S. (1991) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00212.x · Cited by 33
Zwick, R., Sklar, J. C., Wakefield, G., Hamilton, C., Norman, A., & Folsom, D. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00119.x · Cited by 33
Self-citationComparing Graphical and Verbal Representations of Measurement Error In Test Score Reports
Zwick, R., Zapata‐Rivera, D., & Hegarty, M. (2014) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2014.903653 · Cited by 29
Self-citationBasic Measurement Proficiency of Learning Disability Specialists
Bennett, R. E., & Shepherd, M. J. (1982) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.2307/1510579 · Cited by 18
Sklar, J. C., & Zwick, R. (2009) · Journal of Statistics Education · doi:10.1080/10691898.2009.11889539 · Cited by 9
Self-citationUnderwood, J. S., Zapata‐Rivera, D., & VanWinkle, W. H. (2010) · TOEFL iBT research reports · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Zapata-Rivera D., 2010, Exploring effective communication and appropriate use of assessment results through teacher score reports
- Zapata-Rivera D., 2011, Exploring teachers' understanding and use of assessment results
- Zwick, R. & Sklar, J. C. (2011). Teaching teachers about test score interpretation: The ITEMS Project. In D. Zapata-Rivera & R. Zwick (Eds.), Improving test score reporting: Perspectives from the ETS Score Reporting Conference(ETS Research Rep. No. 11-45).(pp. 11–45). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Cited by
Visualizing Uncertainty to Promote Clinicians’ Understanding of Measurement Error
Frans, N., Hummelen, B., Albers, C. J., & Paap, M. C. S. (2023) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221147042 · Cited by 5
“…statistical training have been shown to impact uncertainty understanding (Hopster-den Otter et al., 2019; Shah & Hoeffner, 2002; van der Bles et al., 2019; Zapata-Rivera et al., 2016), it is important to examine how to best communicate measurement accuracy in a population of clinical practitioners.”
BackgroundHeltne, A., Frans, N., Hummelen, B., Falkum, E., Germans Selvik, S., & Paap, M. C. S. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12918 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Zapata-Rivera, D., Zwick, R., & Vezzu, M.
- Venue
- Educational Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-229
- ISSN
- 1062-7197
- 1532-6977
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 21
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
