Cited by 7,777Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Multimedia Learning

Open access
Mayer, Richard·2020·The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation

Abstract

Abstract This article defines and exemplifies multimedia learning and multimedia instruction, describes theoretical frameworks for multimedia learning and multimedia instruction, summarizes evidence-based principles for how to design multimedia instruction, and suggests future trends in multimedia research. Multimedia design principles for reducing extraneous processing include the coherence principle, signaling principle, redundancy principle, spatial contiguity principle, and temporal contiguity principle. Multimedia design principles for managing essential processing include the pre-training principle, segmenting principle, and modality principle. Multimedia design principles for fostering generative processing include the personalization principle, voice principle, embodiment principle, and generative activity principle. Research on multimedia learning represents an example of applying the science of learning to education, and stands as one of educational psychology’s success stories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316941355

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, R.
Corresponding author
Mayer, Richard
Venue
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
41
Issue
0
Pages
27-139
ISSN
0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337068785
Cited by
7,777
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 644 · 2025: 464 · 2024: 351 · 2023: 303 · 2022: 283 · 2021: 465 · 2020: 384 · 2019: 418 · 2018: 406 · 2017: 361 · 2016: 375 · 2015: 369 · 2014: 426 · 2013: 383 · 2012: 348
FWCI
375.16
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
multimedia learning, multimedia teaching, multimedia design principles, coherence principle, signaling principle, redundancy principle, spatial contiguity, temporal contiguity, modality principle, generative processing, science of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review