CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Diverse Music Education InsightsMusic Education and AnalysisArt Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the global decline of music education

Aróstegui, José Luis·2016·Arts Education Policy Review
DOI 10.1080/10632913.2015.1007406
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article seeks to explain the disjuncture between the decline of music education in schools and the importance music has in popular youth culture and in creativity within the new knowledge economy. The data discussed in this article have been derived from analyses of major documents on curriculum reform as well as e-mail responses from music educators around the world. This analysis reveals that these music educators agree with the perception of a demise in music education around the world, as well as the significance of the disjuncture alluded to. The four major reasons found for the decline in music education are: (1) the model of curriculum supported in educational reforms; (2) an emphasis on standardized evaluation; (3) less resources available; and (4) a wrong approach on music advocacy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10632913.2015.1007406

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. ———, 2011, Hellenic Journal of Music, Education and Culture, 2, 5
  2. Burnard P., 2010, Studies in Music from the University of Western Ontario, 23, 18
  3. de la Orden A, 2011, Bordón, 63, 47
  4. European Commission, 2012, Rethinking education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes
  5. European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2006, Official Journal of the European Union, 30.12.2006
  6. Rodríguez Martínez, 2012, Globalisms and power: Iberian educational and curriculum policies
  7. Ministry of Education, Sports and Culture of Spain, 2013, Boletín Oficial del Estado, 295, 97858
  8. ———, 2014, Boletín Oficial del Estado, 52, 19349
  9. Stake R. E., 1991, Custom and cherising: The arts in elementary schools
  10. Tiana A., 2011, Bordón, 63, 63

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aróstegui, J. L.
Venue
Arts Education Policy Review
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-04-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
96-103
ISSN
  • 1063-2913 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4395
DOI
10.1080/10632913.2015.1007406
OpenAlex
W2338140656
Semantic Scholar
74994ca025bf22f9cbe42160c787f963e7211d2f
Cited by
133
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
192.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Arts Education Policy Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
Keywords
school music curriculum, curriculum reform, standardized testing, music education funding, knowledge economy, creativity, youth culture, music teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review