The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Taxon Sampling Is Advantageous for Phylogenetic Inference
Open accessAbstract
David D. Pollock, Derrick J. Zwickl, Jimmy A. McGuire, David M. Hillis, Keith Crandall; Increased Taxon Sampling Is Advantageous for Phylogenetic Inference
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401 · Cited by 2,896
Comparison of phylogenetic trees
Robinson, D. F., & Foulds, L. R. (1981) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2 · Cited by 2,701
Cellular Scaling Rules for the Brains of Marsupials: Not as “Primitive” as Expected
Dos Santos, S. E., Porfirio, J., da Cunha, F. B., Manger, P. R., Tavares, W., Pessoa, L., Raghanti, M. A., Sherwood, C. C., & Herculano-Houzel, S. (2017) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000452856 · Cited by 2,642
Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals
Murphy, W. J., Eizirik, E., Johnson, W. E., Zhang, Y. P., Ryder, O. A., & O'Brien, S. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35054550 · Cited by 1,369
Increased Taxon Sampling Greatly Reduces Phylogenetic Error
Zwickl, D. J., & Hillis, D. M. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102339 · Cited by 939
Self-citationSelecting the Best-Fit Model of Nucleotide Substitution
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (2001) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150118469 · Cited by 937
A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees
Hendy, M. D., & Penny, D. (1989) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992396 · Cited by 811
Is It Better to Add Taxa or Characters to a Difficult Phylogenetic Problem?
Graybeal, A. (1998) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351598260996 · Cited by 728
Cited by
Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science
Lähnemann, D., Köster, J., Szczurek, E., McCarthy, D. J., Hicks, S. C., Robinson, M. D., Vallejos, C. A., Campbell, K. R., Beerenwinkel, N., Mahfouz, A., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6 · Cited by 1,327
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162
Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?
Edwards, S. V. (2009) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00549.x · Cited by 1,040
Increased Taxon Sampling Greatly Reduces Phylogenetic Error
Zwickl, D. J., & Hillis, D. M. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102339 · Cited by 939
Self-citationLIVEZEY, B. C., & ZUSI, R. L. (2007) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollock, D. D., Zwickl, D. J., McGuire, J. A., & Hillis, D. M.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 664-671
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2076195270
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Taxon Sampling Is Advantageous for Phylogenetic Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10635150290102357
- The paper
- Pollock, D. D., Zwickl, D. J., McGuire, J. A., & Hillis, D. M. (2002). Increased Taxon Sampling Is Advantageous for Phylogenetic Inference. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150290102357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
