The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees
Abstract
A direct method for calculating expected data from an evolutionary model for two state characters is described. The method uses four vectors p, q, r and s. p and q are the probabilities of a character change on the 2n − 3 edges of a tree T (n is the number of taxa). r and s are properties of the data, are independent of any tree and have 2n−1 entries. For a given tree T, and with specified probabilities (p or q), we determine r, then s, the expected probabilities of each of the 2n−1 possible partitions of taxa. For any tree T the relationship can be inverted. This allows the probabilities of change on the tree, p and q, to be estimated directly from observed data (r or s). These relationships have been used to analyse the behaviour of tree building algorithms under conditions when there are sufficient data. (This is when the tree does not change as more data are collected, i.e., convergence to a single tree.) With equal rates of evolution (i.e., with a molecular clock), we show that for n = 4 taxa, parsimony will always converge to the correct tree, but we give examples with n = 5 where parsimony will converge on an incorrect tree, even for equal rates of evolution. A further example with n = 6 shows convergence to an incorrect tree with equal but arbitrarily small rates of change. We interpret a basic difficulty with parsimony as ‘long edges attract.’ If there are additional taxa that intersect long edges on the tree, then this effect can be reduced. Some distance methods may also converge to an incorrect tree.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D., & Philippe, H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04336 · Cited by 1,651
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162
Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough
Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Lavrov, D. V., Littlewood, D. T. J., Manuel, M., Wörheide, G., & Baurain, D. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602 · Cited by 1,129
(1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040152 · Cited by 920
Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-s1-s4 · Cited by 705
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendy, M. D., & Penny, D.
- Venue
- Systematic Zoology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297
- ISSN
- 0039-7989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148560957
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2992396
- The paper
- Hendy, M. D., & Penny, D. (1989). A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees. Systematic Zoology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.