CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 592Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness-Based Eating Awareness Training for Treating Binge Eating Disorder: The Conceptual Foundation

Kristeller, Jean L., Wolever, Ruth Q.·2010·Eating Disorders
DOI 10.1080/10640266.2011.533605
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reviews the conceptual foundation of mindfulness-based eating awareness training (MB-EAT). It provides an overview of key therapeutic components as well as a brief review of current research. MB-EAT is a group intervention that was developed for treatment of binge eating disorder (BED) and related issues. BED is marked by emotional, behavioral and physiological disregulation in relation to food intake and self-identity. MB-EAT involves training in mindfulness meditation and guided mindfulness practices that are designed to address the core issues of BED: controlling responses to varying emotional states; making conscious food choices; developing an awareness of hunger and satiety cues; and cultivating self-acceptance. Evidence to date supports the value of MB-EAT in decreasing binge episodes, improving one's sense of self-control with regard to eating, and diminishing depressive symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10640266.2011.533605

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Apple R. A., 1997, Overcoming eating disorders: A cognitive-behavioral treatment for bulimia and binge-eating disorder
  2. Herman C., 1980, Obesity, 208
  3. Kristeller J. L., 2003, Journal of Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 8, 107
  4. Kristeller J. L., 2007, Principles and practices of stress management, 393
  5. Marlatt G. A., Compassion and wisdom in psychotherapy
  6. Schwartz G. E., 1975, American Scientist, 63, 314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 591

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kristeller, J. L., & Wolever, R. Q.
Affiliations
  • Indiana State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Kristeller, Jean L.
ORCID
Venue
Eating Disorders
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-12-28
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
49-61
ISSN
  • 1064-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-530X
DOI
10.1080/10640266.2011.533605
OpenAlex
W2071821164
Cited by
592
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT000416)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
mindfulness-based eating awareness training, binge eating disorder, mindfulness meditation, group intervention, emotion regulation, food choice, self-acceptance, self-control, depressive symptoms, conceptual framework
MeSH terms
Awareness, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hunger, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Theory, Self Concept, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Meditation, Mind-Body Therapies, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review