The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Membrane Separation Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment
Open accessAbstract
With continuing depletion of fresh water resources, focus has shifted more toward water recovery, reuse, and recycling, which require an extension of conventional wastewater treatment technologies. Downstream external factors like stricter compliance requirements for wastewater discharge, rising treatment costs, and spatial constraints necessitate renewed investigation of alternative technologies. Coupled with biological treatment processes, membrane technology has gained considerable attention due to its wide range of applicability and the performance characteristics of membrane systems that have been established by various investigations and innovations during the last decade. This article summarizes research efforts and presents a review of the how and why of their development and applications. The focus is on appraising and comparing technologies on the basis of their relative merits and demerits. Additional facts and figures, especially regarding process parameters and effluent quality, are used to evaluate primary findings on these technologies. Key factors such as loading rates, retention time, cross-flow velocities, membrane types, membrane fouling, and backwashing, etc. are some of the aspects covered. Membrane applications in various aerobic and anaerobic schemes are discussed at length. However, the emphasis is on the use of membranes as a solid/liquid separator, a key in achieving desired effluent quality. Further, technology development directions and possibilities are also explored. The review concludes with an economic assessment of the technologies because one of the key technology selection criteria is financial viability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
A Review on Recent Advances in the Treatment of Dye-Polluted Wastewater
Shabir, M., Yasin, M., Hussain, M., Shafiq, I., Akhter, P., Nizami, A.-S., Jeon, B.-H., & Park, Y.-K. (2022) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2022.05.013 · Cited by 399
Alturki, A. A., Tadkaew, N., McDonald, J. A., Khan, S. J., Price, W. E., & Nghiem, L. D. (2010) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.008 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Visvanathan, C., Aim, R. B., & Parameshwaran, K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-48
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2019886652
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane Separation Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380091184165
- The paper
- Visvanathan, C., Aim, R. B., & Parameshwaran, K. (2000). Membrane Separation Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380091184165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.