The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable water reuse applications
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The aim of this study was to demonstrate the complementarities of combining membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment with nanofiltration (NF) or reverse osmosis (RO) membrane filtration for the removal of trace organic contaminants for potential indirect potable water recycling applications. Four commercially available NF/RO membranes, namely NF270, NF90, BW30 and ESPA2, were selected for this investigation. Challenge tests were conducted with 40 trace organic compounds at concentrations of approximately 2 μg/L in initial wastewater solutions using a laboratory scale MBR system and a cross-flow NF/RO rig. The results suggest that the MBR system effectively removes hydrophobic and biodegradable trace organic compounds. The adsorption of these hydrophobic compounds onto the MBR mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) leads to an extended retention time in the biological reactor, thereby enhancing their removal. The remaining, mostly hydrophilic, trace organic compounds were shown to be effectively removed by NF/RO membranes. The combination of MBR and a low pressure RO membrane resulted in more than 95% removal or removal to below the analytical detection limit of all 40 trace organic compounds investigated in this study. The results also suggest that NF/RO membrane fouling could be mitigated by appropriate membrane selection. Despite a relatively high initial permeate flux, negligible flow rate decline was observed with an NF membrane and a low pressure RO membrane over more than 25 h of filtration, possibly due to the smooth surfaces of these two particular membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades
Shannon, M. A., Bohn, P. W., Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J. G., Mariñas, B. J., & Mayes, A. M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06599 · Cited by 8,465
Vrijenhoek, E. M., Hong, S., & Elimelech, M. (2001) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00376-3 · Cited by 1,206
Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment—a literature review
Bellona, C., Drewes, J. E., Xu, P., & Amy, G. (2004) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.034 · Cited by 1,077
Peer Reviewed: Scrutinizing Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Wastewater Treatment
Ternes, T. A., Joss, A., & Siegrist, H. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es040639t · Cited by 876
Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment
Radjenović, J., Petrović, M., Ventura, F., & Barceló, D. (2008) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.020 · Cited by 723
The status of membrane bioreactor technology
Judd, S. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005 · Cited by 638
Yang, W., Cicek, N., & Ilg, J. (2006) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.010 · Cited by 596
Membrane Separation Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment
Visvanathan, C., Aim, R. B., & Parameshwaran, K. (2000) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380091184165 · Cited by 499
Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse
Melin, T., Jefferson, B., Bixio, D., et al. (2006) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.086 · Cited by 481
Vanderford, B. J., & Snyder, S. A. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0613198 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability
Le, N. L., & Nunes, S. P. (2016) · Sustainable Materials and Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2016.02.001 · Cited by 432
Rizzo, L., Gernjak, W., Krzeminski, P., Malato, S., McArdell, C. S., Perez, J. A. S., Schaar, H., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136312 · Cited by 308
Merel, S., Nikiforov, A. I., & Snyder, S. A. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.025 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Alturki, A. A., Tadkaew, N., McDonald, J. A., Khan, S. J., Price, W. E., & Nghiem, L. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Membrane Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 206-215
- ISSN
- 0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1529840420
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable water reuse applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.008
- The paper
- Alturki, A. A., Tadkaew, N., McDonald, J. A., Khan, S. J., Price, W. E., & Nghiem, L. D. (2010). Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable water reuse applications. Journal of Membrane Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.