The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxic Metals in the Environment: Thermodynamic Considerations for Possible Immobilization Strategies for Pb, Cd, As, and Hg
Abstract
The contamination of soils by toxic metals is a widespread, serious problem that demands immediate action either by removal or immobilization, which is defined as a process which puts the metal into a chemical form, probably as a mineral, which will be inert and highly insoluble under conditions that will exist in the soil. If metals are to be immobilized, this might be achieved by the addition of sufficient amounts of the anion or anions which can form the inert mineral. A serious complication arises from the fact that all soils have several other cations that can and do react with the anions. This paper is a review of the equilibrium-state chemistry for the possible immobilizations of four metals: lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury. The anions which might precipitate these metals include: oxide, hydroxide, chloride, sulfate, sulfide, phosphates, molybdate, and carbonate. The metal ions which can interfere with these precipitation reactions are calcium, magnesium, iron, aluminum, and manganese. All of the probable combinations are reviewed, and possible immobilization strategies are evaluated from the point of view of thermodynamic stability using free energies of formation scattered throughout the literature. The systems are examined from the point of view of the phase rule and stoichiometric consideration over the 2–12 pH range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: An evaluation
Mulligan, C. N., Yong, R. N., & Gibbs, B. F. (2001) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00101-0 · Cited by 1,521
Cited by
Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils – To mobilize or to immobilize?
Bolan, N., Kunhikrishnan, A., Thangarajan, R., Kumpiene, J., Park, J., Makino, T., Kirkham, M. B., & Scheckel, K. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.018 · Cited by 2,031
Self-citationStabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments–a review
Kumpiene, J., Lagerkvist, A., & Maurice, C. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.012 · Cited by 1,618
Palansooriya, K. N., Shaheen, S. M., Chen, S. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Hashimoto, Y., Hou, D., Bolan, N. S., Rinklebe, J., & Ok, Y. S. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105046 · Cited by 1,272
Electrochemical sensing in paper-based microfluidic devices
Nie, Z., Nijhuis, C. A., Gong, J., Chen, X., Kumachev, A., Martinez, A. W., Narovlyansky, M., & Whitesides, G. M. (2010) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/b917150a · Cited by 929
Remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals with an emphasis on immobilization technology
Derakhshan Nejad, Z., Jung, M. C., & Kim, K.-H. (2018) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-017-9964-z · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- PORTER, S. K., SCHECKEL, K. G., IMPELLITTERI, C. A., & RYAN, J. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 495-604
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2015686791
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxic Metals in the Environment: Thermodynamic Considerations for Possible Immobilization Strategies for Pb, Cd, As, and Hg. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380490492412
- The paper
- PORTER, S. K., SCHECKEL, K. G., IMPELLITTERI, C. A., & RYAN, J. A. (2004). Toxic Metals in the Environment: Thermodynamic Considerations for Possible Immobilization Strategies for Pb, Cd, As, and Hg. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380490492412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.