The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Review on the Status and Stress Effects
Abstract
‘Water is life,’ so central to human life, yet over one billion people across the world have no access to safe drinking water. Of late, there has been increasing global attention focused on resolving water quality problems especially in developing countries, as the lack of access to clean water denies the most essential of all rights, the right to life. The latest estimates suggest that around 200 million people, from among 25 nations the world over, are under the dreadful fate of fluorosis. India and China, the two most populous countries of the world, are the worst affected. India is plagued with numerous water quality problems due to prolific contaminants mainly of geogenic origin and fluoride stands first among them. The weathering of primary rocks and leaching of fluoride-containing minerals in soils yield fluoride rich groundwater in India which is generally associated with low calcium content and high bicarbonate ions. The unfettered ground water tapping exacerbates the failure of drinking water sources and accelerates the entry of fluoride into groundwater. Most of the scientific literature substantiates the benefits of low fluoride concentrations in preventing dental decay. However, as a surprising paradox, incidence of dental, skeletal and crippling skeletal fluorosis was reported in India with average fluoride concentrations as low as 0.5, 0.7 and 2.8 ppm respectively. Fluorosis, turns out to be the most widespread geochemical disease in India, affecting more than 66 million people including 6 million children under 14 years age. Though fluoride has spread its tentacles in 36,988 habitations and the number of people falling prey to fluoride poisoning have been steadily increasing, an exact exposure-health relationship is yet to be properly elucidated. There is an essential relation between poverty and fluorosis as malnutrition is found to play an aggressive role in its severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
Recognition and sensing of fluoride anion
Cametti, M., & Rissanen, K. (2009) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/b902069a · Cited by 654
Bain, R., Cronk, R., Wright, J., Yang, H., Slaymaker, T., & Bartram, J. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001644 · Cited by 619
Electrochemistry: as cause and cure in water pollution—an overview
Vasudevan, S., & Oturan, M. A. (2014) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-013-0434-2 · Cited by 355
Genesis of geogenic contaminated groundwater: As, F and I
Wang, Y., Li, J., Ma, T., Xie, X., Deng, Y., & Gan, Y. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2020.1807452 · Cited by 259
Sources and toxicity of fluoride in the environment
Ghosh, A., Mukherjee, K., Ghosh, S. K., & Saha, B. (2013) · Research on Chemical Intermediates · doi:10.1007/s11164-012-0841-1 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayoob, S., & Gupta, A. K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 433-487
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W1973295190
- Cited by
- 1,355
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Review on the Status and Stress Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380600678112
- The paper
- Ayoob, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2006). Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Review on the Status and Stress Effects. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380600678112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.