Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Conceptual Overview on Sustainable Technologies for the Defluoridation of Drinking Water

Ayoob, S., Gupta, A. K., Bhat, Venugopal T.·2008·Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Abstract

Water is precious to us, as it supports every spheres of human life. The increasing reports on pollution of this “sacred resource” from different sources show our scant regard to this pivotal issue. People in more than 35 nations across the globe face issues of excess fluoride in drinking water, the intensity and severity of which varies with the environmental settings in terms of their geographical and economical status. It has been observed that very few proven sustainable options are available for fluoride removal, especially in developing countries, where the impact of the issue is highly intense. Though the considerable amount of research undertaken worldwide has thrown up many technologies, each having its own advantages and limitations, a lasting solution is still at large. The coagulation and adsorption/ion-exchange processes are the most widely opted defluoridation techniques practiced in fluoride-endemic areas. The Nalgonda technique and adsorption by bone char, or a combination of both, have been used in many developing countries like India and Tanzania, at both domestic and community levels. The membrane processes assure good quality water, but are “higher technology and higher cost” options for most of the fluoride-endemic nations. Electrochemical techniques are “energy-intensive” options but offer excellent fluoride removal. However, the lack of concise conceptual reviews is visibly felt in defluoridation research, which prompted us to carry out this study. This article highlights the underlying basic principles and processes involved in existing fluoride removal technologies so as to catalyze further research in this area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10643380701413310

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Ayoob, S., Gupta, A. K., & Bhat, V. T.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2008-09-15
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
401-470
ISSN
  • 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6537
OpenAlex
W2049913593
Cited by
335
References
1
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Overview on Sustainable Technologies for the Defluoridation of Drinking Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380701413310
The paper
Ayoob, S., Gupta, A. K., & Bhat, V. T. (2008). A Conceptual Overview on Sustainable Technologies for the Defluoridation of Drinking Water. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701413310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.