The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Conceptual Overview on Sustainable Technologies for the Defluoridation of Drinking Water
Abstract
Water is precious to us, as it supports every spheres of human life. The increasing reports on pollution of this “sacred resource” from different sources show our scant regard to this pivotal issue. People in more than 35 nations across the globe face issues of excess fluoride in drinking water, the intensity and severity of which varies with the environmental settings in terms of their geographical and economical status. It has been observed that very few proven sustainable options are available for fluoride removal, especially in developing countries, where the impact of the issue is highly intense. Though the considerable amount of research undertaken worldwide has thrown up many technologies, each having its own advantages and limitations, a lasting solution is still at large. The coagulation and adsorption/ion-exchange processes are the most widely opted defluoridation techniques practiced in fluoride-endemic areas. The Nalgonda technique and adsorption by bone char, or a combination of both, have been used in many developing countries like India and Tanzania, at both domestic and community levels. The membrane processes assure good quality water, but are “higher technology and higher cost” options for most of the fluoride-endemic nations. Electrochemical techniques are “energy-intensive” options but offer excellent fluoride removal. However, the lack of concise conceptual reviews is visibly felt in defluoridation research, which prompted us to carry out this study. This article highlights the underlying basic principles and processes involved in existing fluoride removal technologies so as to catalyze further research in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reducing Aluminum Residuals in Finished Water
Qureshi, N., & Malmberg, R. H. (1985) · Journal AWWA · doi:10.1002/j.1551-8833.1985.tb05627.x · Cited by 27
Cited by
Review of fluoride removal from water environment by adsorption
He, J., Yang, Y., Wu, Z., Xie, C., Zhang, K., Kong, L., & Liu, J. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104516 · Cited by 319
Fluoride and human health: systematic appraisal of sources, exposures, metabolism, and toxicity
Kabir, H., Gupta, A. K., & Tripathy, S. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2019.1647028 · Cited by 228
Self-citationNanoadsorbents for wastewater treatment: next generation biotechnological solution
Ali, M. E., Hoque, M. E., Safdar Hossain, S. K., & Biswas, M. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02755-4 · Cited by 120
Banji, D., Banji, O. J. F., Pratusha, N. G., & Annamalai, A. R. (2013) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.076 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayoob, S., Gupta, A. K., & Bhat, V. T.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-09-15
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 401-470
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2049913593
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Overview on Sustainable Technologies for the Defluoridation of Drinking Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380701413310
- The paper
- Ayoob, S., Gupta, A. K., & Bhat, V. T. (2008). A Conceptual Overview on Sustainable Technologies for the Defluoridation of Drinking Water. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701413310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.