The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Removal of Synthetic Textile Dyes From Wastewaters: A Critical Review on Present Treatment Technologies
Abstract
Azo dyes represent the largest class of industrial colorants. These are no longer used only for the coloration of textiles, plastics, paints, inks, and lacquers, but rather serve as key components in high-tech applications such as optical data storage, reprographics, display devices, dye-sensitized solar cells, energy transfer cascades, light-emitting diodes, laser welding processes, or heat management systems. Azo dyes are also of growing importance in the medical and biomedical fields. In most of these applications, the color is largely irrelevant and it is the ability of the colorants to absorb visible electromagnetic radiation with high efficiency, or other functional property, that is exploited. With the growing awareness and environmental concerns, it is imperative that the hierarchy of reduce, reuse, and degrade be adopted and measures be taken to remove color from the industrial discharge. The present review (a) embodies a comparison of the present decolorization/degradation techniques for water-soluble and insoluble dyes, (b) describes their advantages and limitations, (c) discusses various mechanisms, and (d) focuses on the present literature on microbial decolorization of textile dyes specifically by using bacteria, fungus, yeast, and algae. Also, for the first time an attempt has been made to comprehensively compile chemical and biological decolorization/degradation of disperse dyes. The research on the decolorization of textile dyes has mainly been focused on water-soluble dyes, while decolorization of disperse dyes that are water insoluble have received only scant attention and constitutes a topical area of concern as these dyes persist for a longer duration in textile effluents. Given the limitations (vide infra) of the chemical treatment methods, decolorization using biological means is an interesting option.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advancement of Coagulation–Flocculation and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment
Teh, C. Y., Budiman, P. M., Shak, K. P. Y., & Wu, T. Y. (2016) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04703 · Cited by 1,160
Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review
Bhatia, D., Sharma, N. R., Singh, J., & Kanwar, R. S. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 · Cited by 816
Microalgae-Based Wastewater Treatment for Nutrients Recovery: A Review
Li, K., Liu, Q., Fang, F., Luo, R., Lu, Q., Zhou, W., Huo, S., Cheng, P., Liu, J., Addy, M., et al. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121934 · Cited by 737
Yin, Z., Zhu, L., Li, S., Hu, T., Chu, R., Mo, F., Hu, D., Liu, C., & Li, B. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122804 · Cited by 522
Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review
Aragaw, T. A., & Bogale, F. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.764958 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, K., & Arora, S.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 807-878
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2095403428
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Synthetic Textile Dyes From Wastewaters: A Critical Review on Present Treatment Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380903218376
- The paper
- Singh, K., & Arora, S. (2011). Removal of Synthetic Textile Dyes From Wastewaters: A Critical Review on Present Treatment Technologies. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380903218376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.